Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
Lightweight machine learning framework using temporal features for electric vehicle demand response forecasting on
Ali Mujtaba Durrani1, Azzam Ul Asar1, Abdul Aziz2
1Department of Electrical Engineering, CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan.
Lightweight machine learning models effectively forecast electric vehicle (EV) charging loads and optimize demand response (DR) strategies, even in low-computation environments. XGBoost and Random Forest show the highest accuracy for EV energy management.
Area of Science:
- Energy Management
- Machine Learning
- Electric Vehicles
Background:
- Rising electric vehicle (EV) adoption presents significant challenges for grid energy management, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
- Effective demand response (DR) strategies are crucial for balancing energy supply and demand with increasing EV integration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate lightweight machine learning (ML) models for accurate EV charging load forecasting.
- To optimize various demand response (DR) strategies using predicted EV load profiles.
- To assess model performance in terms of prediction accuracy and computational efficiency for low-resource environments.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a Kaggle dataset of time-series EV charging data, performing preprocessing, down-sampling, and feature engineering.
- Implemented and compared five ML models: Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).
- Evaluated seven DR strategies (Peak Clipping, Valley Filling, Load Shifting, Load Levelling, Strategic Load Growth, Strategic Conservation, Flexible Load Shape) using MAE, RMSE, and R² metrics.
Main Results:
- XGBoost demonstrated the highest accuracy, achieving an R² score of 0.975 for Strategic Conservation and 0.943 for Valley Filling.
- Random Forest also performed well, with an R² score of 0.91, indicating strong predictive capabilities.
- Linear Regression and kNN models showed significantly lower performance, with R² values rarely exceeding 0.50 across most DR strategies.
Conclusions:
- Lightweight ML models are capable of delivering high performance for EV load prediction and DR modeling.
- These models offer scalable solutions for grid operators and policymakers in environments with limited computational resources.
- The findings highlight the potential of optimized DR strategies powered by efficient ML for managing EV energy demand.
Related Concept Videos
Distributed Loads
For example, consider a bookshelf filled with books stacked vertically adjacent to each other. The weight of the books is evenly distributed over the length of the shelf. As a result, the pressure at different locations on the surface of the...
Distributed Loads: Problem Solving
Energy and Power Signals
Transient and Steady-state Response
These test signals are integral in designing control systems to exhibit two key performance aspects: transient response and steady-state...
Maximum Power Flow and Line Loadability
Fast Decoupled and DC Powerflow