Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

06:24
Author Spotlight: A Novel Cell Injection Method with Minimum Invasion
Published on: April 21, 2023
1.9K
Efficacy of Ionization-Adjusted PN Filler in Minimizing Injection Pain: A Randomized, Patient-Blinded, Split-Face
Woosang Jeon1, Minwoo Park1, Sug Won Kim1
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|December 8, 2025
Summary
A new ionization-adjusted polynucleotide (PN) filler significantly reduces injection pain for skin rejuvenation compared to conventional PN fillers. This novel filler maintains comparable efficacy and safety, offering a more comfortable patient experience.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Aesthetic Medicine
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Polynucleotide (PN) fillers are utilized for skin rejuvenation, leveraging their regenerative capabilities.
- Injection-associated pain is a significant limitation of current PN filler treatments.
- Developing pain-reduced formulations is crucial for improving patient compliance and treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel "ionization-adjusted" PN filler.
- To compare injection-related pain between the novel PN filler and a conventional PN filler.
- To assess the impact of modified pH and ionic strength on filler performance.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, patient-blinded, split-face study design was employed.
- Fifteen participants received both conventional and ionized PN fillers in separate facial areas.
- Pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); efficacy was assessed via Crow's Feet Grading Scale (CFGS) and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
Main Results:
- The ionized PN filler showed significantly lower pain scores (VAS 3.39 ± 1.81) versus conventional filler (VAS 5.04 ± 2.19, p < 0.005).
- Fewer adverse events like erythema (40% vs. 60%) and embossing (13.3% vs. 56.7%) were observed with the ionized filler.
- Both fillers demonstrated comparable improvements in wrinkle severity (CFGS) and overall aesthetic appearance (GAIS).
Conclusions:
- The ionization-adjusted PN filler offers a significant reduction in injection pain compared to conventional formulations.
- This novel filler maintains comparable clinical efficacy and safety profiles to existing PN fillers.
- The modified PN filler presents a more comfortable and potentially more widely adoptable option for skin rejuvenation treatments.
Keywords:
Aesthetic dermatologyInjection painIonization adjustmentPolynucleotide fillerSkin boosterSplit-face trialMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Blinding
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

