Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Viral Recombination00:57

Viral Recombination

24.9K
Cells are sometimes infected by more than one virus at once. When two viruses disassemble to expose their genomes for replication in the same cell, similar regions of their genomes can pair together and exchange sequences in a process called recombination. Alternatively, viruses with segmented genomes can swap segments in a process called reassortment.
24.9K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.5K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

26.2K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.2K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.1K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural Correlates of Visuomotor Co-regulation in Social Synchronization.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

An evolutionary conserved neural mechanism for interpersonal coordination in primates.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Head Down Tilt 15° to Increase Collateral Flow in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Rationale and Study Protocol of a Multicenter, Randomized, Proof-of-Concept, Phase 2a/b Trial in Patients Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy (DOWN-SUITE).

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Blood derived extracellular vesicles in patients with glioblastoma: preliminary experience from a monoinstitutional series.

Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico·2026
Same author

Together we sync: a systematic qualitative and quantitative review of fMRI hyperscanning studies.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2025
Same author

Effects of emergent and planned interpersonal synchronization on individual spatiotemporal variability.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same journal

Differentiation of cortical areas: effects of free energy minimization with broken symmetry.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Prior exposure to speech rapidly modulates cortical processing of high-level linguistic structure.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Beta bursts in SMA mediate anticipatory muscle inhibition.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Cognitive load modulates the effects of social contexts on facial expression processing.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

The neural mechanisms of aligning spatial perspectives.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Relationships between bilateral tapping skills and brain gray matter volumes: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.3K

Sharing errors with human and non-human agents.

Margherita Adelaide Musco1, Lucia Maria Sacheli1,2, Danilo Leggio1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126, Milan (MI), Italy.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|December 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Goal sharing enhances interpersonal action monitoring. This study found that shared goals improve how we process errors from both human and computer partners, activating brain regions for action control.

Keywords:
errorsfMRIjoint actionshared goalssocial monitoring

More Related Videos

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

562
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.3K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

562
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Interpersonal action monitoring is crucial for effective social interaction.
  • Previous research indicates that interaction goals and the nature of the co-actor (human/non-human) influence error processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how shared goals and the human/non-human nature of a partner affect interpersonal action monitoring during minimally joint tasks.
  • To examine the neural correlates of error monitoring under different interaction conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to record brain activity.
  • Participants performed a melody-playing task with either a human or a computer partner.
  • Experimental conditions included shared vs. individual goals and human vs. computer co-actors.

Main Results:

  • Brain activation patterns post-error allowed decoding of the partner's nature (human/non-human) but only when goals were shared.
  • Behavioral adaptations following errors, in the shared goal condition, correlated with activity in the pre-supplementary motor area and right anterior insula.
  • These brain regions are known to be involved in proactive action control.

Conclusions:

  • Shared goals significantly enhance interpersonal action monitoring, even in minimal interactions.
  • Goal sharing facilitates the processing of errors from both human and non-human partners.
  • Neural mechanisms supporting proactive action control are engaged during shared-goal error monitoring.