Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
Comparative effectiveness and safety of systemic therapies for treatment-naïve, PD-L1 expression <1% advanced NSCLC:
Mengyun Zhou1,2, Junfang Huang1, Zhou Jin1
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Background:
For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression <1% and no actionable oncogenic alterations, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (Pembro-chemo) is widely regarded as the current standard of care. However, emerging therapeutic combinations and preliminary results from ongoing trials challenge its superiority, particularly across different histologic types. Therefore, this study aimed to appraise the effectiveness and safety of first-line treatment for PD-L1 <1% advanced, non-squamous and squamous NSCLC.
Methods:
PubMed, Ovid Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from database inception to August 15, 2025, to identify phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored first-line treatments in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC, PD-L1 <1%, no epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations; and reported any efficacy outcome were eligible for inclusion. Treatment effectiveness was quantified using overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Surface under the cumulative ranking value (SUCRA) was used to rank the therapies. Risk of bias for included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.
Results:
Twenty-five phase III RCTs involving 5,815 participants were eligible. Overall, 21 first-line treatments were identified. In terms of OS, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy + canakinumab (Pembro-chemo-canakinumab) (SUCRA =0.90) showed great potential in improving outcomes, although its long-term efficacy still needed to be validated. Nivolumab + ipilimumab (Nivo-ipi) (SUCRA =0.78) closely followed. Both top regimens showed non-significant superiority over Pembro-chemo. Regarding PFS, nivolumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab (SUCRA =0.88), and serplulimab + chemotherapy (SUCRA =0.87) were the optimal regimens. Specifically for non-squamous patients, Pembro-chemo was optimal for OS (SUCRA =0.90), followed by Nivolumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab (SUCRA =0.82). Nivolumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab optimized PFS, with an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.92 vs. Pembro-chemo]. For squamous patients, nivolumab + ipilimumab ± chemotherapy (Nivo-ipi-chemo) led in OS, while serplulimab + chemotherapy in PFS.
Conclusions:
First-line personalized treatment for PD-L1 <1%, advanced NSCLC should be histology-based, balancing efficacy and toxicity. Pembro-chemo and nivolumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab combinations are recommended as the optimal first-line options for non-squamous patients, and Nivo-ipi-chemo for squamous patients.
Insights
For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with low PD-L1 expression, histology-based first-line treatments are recommended. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus chemotherapy plus bevacizumab are optimal for non-squamous NSCLC, while nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy is best for squamous NSCLC.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression <1% and no actionable mutations typically receives pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (Pembro-chemo) as standard care.
- Emerging therapeutic combinations and trial data suggest potential alternatives that may challenge the current standard, especially across different NSCLC histologic types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 <1%, specifically comparing non-squamous and squamous subtypes.
- To identify optimal treatment strategies beyond the current standard of care for this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted across PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to August 15, 2025.
- Included RCTs focused on treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 <1% and no EGFR/ALK alterations, reporting efficacy outcomes like overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).
- Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Value (SUCRA) was used for therapy ranking, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.
Main Results:
- Twenty-five phase III RCTs with 5,815 participants identified 21 first-line treatments.
- For overall survival (OS), pembrolizumab + chemotherapy + canakinumab showed potential (SUCRA=0.90), followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab (SUCRA=0.78), with both demonstrating non-significant superiority over Pembro-chemo.
- Optimal progression-free survival (PFS) regimens included nivolumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab (SUCRA=0.88) and serplulimab + chemotherapy (SUCRA=0.87). For non-squamous NSCLC, Pembro-chemo was optimal for OS (SUCRA=0.90), while nivolumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab optimized PFS (HR=0.52). For squamous NSCLC, nivolumab + ipilimumab ± chemotherapy led in OS, and serplulimab + chemotherapy in PFS.
Conclusions:
- First-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 <1% should be personalized based on histology, balancing efficacy and toxicity.
- Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and nivolumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab are recommended as optimal first-line options for non-squamous NSCLC.
- Nivolumab + ipilimumab ± chemotherapy is recommended as the optimal first-line treatment for squamous NSCLC.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
06:07Monitoring PD-1-Blocking Antibodies Bound to T Cells Derived from a Drop of Peripheral Blood
Published on: February 5, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...