Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

09:23
A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
Published on: October 16, 2012
13.1K
Agreement Between Evoked Potentials and Behavioral Thresholds Using LS-Chirp and 1 kHz Tone Burst in Normal-Hearing
Wan Madihah W Embong1,2, Sarah Rahmat1,3, Ahmad Aidil Arafat Dzulkarnain1,3
1Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia.
Seminars in Hearing
|December 10, 2025
Summary
Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) agreement with hearing thresholds depends on stimulus rate. Faster rates favor auditory brainstem response (ABR) agreement, while slower rates favor cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) agreement.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Neuroscience
- Hearing Science
Background:
- Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), including auditory brainstem response (ABR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP), are crucial for estimating hearing thresholds in non-responsive individuals.
- The relationship between brainstem/cortical activity and perceptual hearing thresholds, influenced by stimulus characteristics, requires further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the agreement between AEPs (ABR and CAEP) and behavioral hearing thresholds.
- To determine how different stimulus types and presentation rates impact this agreement.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted on adult participants (n=8 and n=12 ears).
- Experiment 1 used LS CE-Chirp stimuli at 33.3 stimuli/second.
- Experiment 2 used 1 kHz tone bursts at varying rates (33.3 and 1.0 stimuli/second) and standard pure tone audiometry, with thresholds determined via the Hughson-Westlake method.
Main Results:
- For LS CE-Chirp stimuli at 33.3 stimuli/second, ABR showed better agreement with behavioral thresholds than CAEP (p < 0.05).
- For 1 kHz tone bursts at 1.0 stimuli/second, CAEP demonstrated better agreement than ABR (p < 0.05).
- At 33.3 stimuli/second with 1 kHz tone bursts, no significant difference in agreement was found between ABR and CAEP (p > 0.05). Both AEP types agreed comparably with clinical audiometry.
Conclusions:
- Stimulus type and presentation rate significantly influence auditory evoked potential threshold estimation.
- Slower presentation rates enhance agreement between cortical activity and behavioral thresholds, whereas faster rates favor brainstem activity agreement.
- These findings suggest context-dependent measurement strategies for identifying auditory dysfunction, warranting further validation in larger studies.

