Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

14.4K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.4K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

14.8K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
14.8K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

9.9K
9.9K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

14.8K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
14.8K
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods01:22

Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods

594
Determining protein-drug binding can be achieved through indirect and direct methods, each providing valuable insights into the interaction between proteins and drugs.
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
594

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cannabidiol-sensitive region involved in the allosteric modulation of the α7 nicotinic receptor.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Closed-Loop Neurotechnologies, Agency and Mental Interference.

AJOB neuroscience·2026
Same author

Large-Scale Collaborative Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery Using OpenFE.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Umbrella Sampling Workflows for Fast-Converging PMF Calculations without Artificial WHAM Constraints.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Structural basis for pH-responsive amino acid transport via SLC7A4.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Structural basis for prostaglandin and drug transport via SLCO2A1.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Correction to "AstraMEV (AI-Guided Structural Assembly of Multi-Epitope Vaccines) Against Infectious Bronchitis Virus".

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

MolPy: A Large Language Model-Friendly Toolkit for Reactive Topology Editing in Polymer Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Molecular Mechanisms of KIT Receptor Dimerization and Oncogenic Activation Revealed by Multiscale Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Structural and Thermodynamic Discrimination between Agonists and Antagonists of Retinoic Acid Receptor γ and the Vitamin D Receptor.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

PACEff Builder: An Efficient Platform for Constructing PACE Hybrid-Resolution Models for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Aqueous Protein, Peptide Assembly, and Membrane Protein Systems.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

TransKla: A Local-Global Cross-Attention Based Transformer Approach for Prediction of Lysine Lactylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Can AI-Predicted Complexes Teach Machine Learning to Compute Drug Binding Affinity?

Wei-Tse Hsu1, Savva Grevtsev2, Anna M Herz3

  • 1Structural Bioinformatics and Computational Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, U.K.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|December 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Co-folding models can augment data for machine learning-based scoring functions (MLSFs). Performance gains from synthetic data depend on structural quality, guiding future data augmentation strategies.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.6K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.6K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Structural biology
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Machine learning-based scoring functions (MLSFs) are crucial for predicting binding affinity.
  • Synthetic data augmentation is a promising approach to improve MLSF performance.
  • Co-folding models offer a potential source of synthetic structural data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of using co-folding models for synthetic data augmentation in MLSF training.
  • To determine the impact of augmented data quality on MLSF performance.
  • To develop methods for identifying high-quality co-folding predictions for data augmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized co-folding models to generate synthetic protein complex structures.
  • Trained MLSFs using both experimental and co-folding-derived data.
  • Developed and applied heuristics to assess the structural quality of co-folding predictions.
  • Compared MLSF performance using different data augmentation strategies.

Main Results:

  • Performance gains from co-folding data augmentation are highly dependent on the structural quality of the predictions.
  • Established simple heuristics can effectively identify high-quality co-folding predictions without requiring experimental structures.
  • Co-folding predictions, when filtered by quality, can successfully substitute for experimental structures in MLSF training.

Conclusions:

  • Co-folding models are a feasible, albeit quality-dependent, source for synthetic data augmentation in MLSF training.
  • Heuristics for quality control are essential for successful data augmentation using co-folding models.
  • This work provides a framework for leveraging co-folding models to enhance binding affinity prediction through data augmentation.