Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
Uncertainty estimates in pharmacokinetic modelling of DCE-MRI
Jonas M Van Elburg1, Natalia V Korobova1, Mohammad M Islam2
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Mean-variance estimation (MVE) neural networks improve dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) by providing accurate perfusion quantification and reliable uncertainty estimates, enhancing clinical confidence in AI-driven analysis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Quantitative MRI
Background:
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) quantifies tissue perfusion but faces challenges in accuracy due to noisy data and complex modeling.
- Conventional methods like non-linear least squares (NLLS) fitting produce noisy parameter maps.
- Deep learning models offer smoother maps but lack reliable uncertainty quantification, potentially misleading clinicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate an ensemble of mean-variance estimation (MVE) neural networks for DCE-MRI.
- To quantify perfusion parameters and associated aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.
- To compare MVE's performance against NLLS and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for uncertainty estimation.
Main Methods:
- Developed an ensemble of MVE neural networks for DCE-MRI perfusion quantification.
- Implemented conventional covariance matrix-based uncertainty estimation for NLLS and PINNs.
- Compared MVE with NLLS and PINNs using simulations and in vivo data, focusing on perfusion accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
Main Results:
- MVE demonstrated superior accuracy in both perfusion and uncertainty estimates compared to NLLS and PINNs in simulations.
- MVE's aleatoric uncertainty closely correlated with actual errors, unlike NLLS and PINNs which tended to overestimate.
- In vivo, MVE generated smoother, more reliable uncertainty maps, particularly in liver regions, outperforming NLLS and PINNs.
Conclusions:
- MVE enhances quantitative DCE-MRI by providing robust perfusion parameters and uncertainty estimates.
- This approach increases the reliability of AI-driven MRI analysis, fostering greater clinical confidence.
- MVE facilitates the clinical translation of advanced quantitative MRI techniques.
More Related Videos
09:00Spatial Measurements of Perfusion, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Liposomes Accumulation in Solid Tumors
Published on: August 18, 2016
06:31Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Uncertainty: Overview
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Three-Compartment Open Model