Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Experimental Procedure for Warm Spinning of Cast Aluminum Components
Published on: February 1, 2017
Comparative Study on Intermediate-Temperature Deformation Mechanisms of Inconel 718 Alloys Fabricated by Additive
Jin Wu1, Yetao Cheng1,2, Jinlong Su3
1State Key Laboratory of Cemented Carbide, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
Additively manufactured Inconel 718 (IN718) exhibits unique microstructural properties due to its solidification behavior. These differences significantly impact its heat treatment response and intermediate-temperature deformation compared to forged IN718.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Metallurgy
- Additive Manufacturing
Background:
- Additively manufactured (AM) Inconel 718 (IN718) displays distinct solidification behavior compared to conventionally forged IN718.
- This leads to unique microstructural and precipitation responses, affecting heat treatment and intermediate-temperature deformation.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing AM IN718 performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare the intermediate-temperature (450-750 °C) deformation mechanisms of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)-fabricated and forged IN718 alloys.
- To investigate the influence of various heat-treatment conditions on these mechanisms.
- To elucidate the role of the delta (δ) phase and niobium (Nb) segregation in LPBF IN718.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of LPBF-fabricated and forged IN718 alloys.
- Application of different heat treatments: solution treatment and solution + aging (STA).
- Microstructural characterization and mechanical property evaluation under intermediate-temperature deformation.
Main Results:
- Solution-treated LPBF IN718 showed fine columnar grains, high dislocation density, and retained δ phase at grain boundaries.
- Forged IN718 exhibited coarse equiaxed grains without δ phase after solution treatment.
- STA treatment: δ phase in LPBF IN718 pinned grain boundaries, enhancing flow stress; forged IN718 strengthening dominated by γ″/γ' precipitation.
- LPBF IN718 had fewer γ″/γ' precipitates and slightly lower strength post-STA due to Nb consumption by δ phase.
Conclusions:
- The inherent δ phase retention and Nb segregation in LPBF-built IN718 critically influence its precipitation behavior and deformation resistance.
- These factors distinguish LPBF IN718 from conventionally processed alloys.
- Provides valuable insights for microstructure design in AM-built high-temperature superalloys.
Related Concept Videos
Temperature Dependent Deformation
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials
Residual Stresses

