Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

629
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
629

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PCWG4: A Missed Opportunity to Make Bone-Protective Agents Mandatory for Patients With Bone Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Diagnosis and Staging of Patients with Prostate Cancer: Report from the 2025 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) Diagnostics.

European urology·2026
Same author

EMETPRO: a multicentric, international, retrospective analysis evaluating patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with early progression.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2026
Same author

The Diagnostic Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Patients with Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy and Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

European urology oncology·2026
Same author

On-treatment serum prostate-specific antigen and overall survival in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE platform protocol): a post-hoc analysis of data from five phase 3 trials.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Hot flushes during ADT for prostate cancer - a clinical rationale for a neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist.

Nature reviews. Urology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

17.0K

Predicting Toxicities and Survival Outcomes in De Novo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Using Clinical

Giuseppe Salfi1,2, Martino Pedrani1,2, Amos Colombo3,4

  • 1Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Cancers
|December 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Monitoring vital signs and lab results during treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) can improve survival predictions. Combining these dynamic factors with baseline data enhances the identification of poor responders.

Keywords:
ARPIadverse eventsblood testshormone-sensitivemHSPCmachine learningprognosticprostate cancertoxicity

More Related Videos

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
07:25

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Published on: March 6, 2018

13.7K
Pre-clinical Orthotopic Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer
07:01

Pre-clinical Orthotopic Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer

Published on: August 29, 2016

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

17.0K
A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
07:25

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Published on: March 6, 2018

13.7K
Pre-clinical Orthotopic Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer
07:01

Pre-clinical Orthotopic Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer

Published on: August 29, 2016

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Conventional prognostic factors for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) are assessed at diagnosis.
  • Variations in vital signs and laboratory parameters during treatment may predict prognosis and toxicity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prognostic value of dynamic changes in vital signs and laboratory parameters during systemic treatment for mHSPC.
  • To compare the performance of machine learning models using static versus dynamic variables for predicting outcomes and toxicities.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 363 de novo mHSPC patients (2014-2023).
  • Systematic collection of clinical and laboratory data, grading variations using CTCAE V5.0.
  • Cox regression and machine learning models (SVC, Random Forest, LGBM) were used to analyze dynamic variables' impact on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and organ-specific toxicities.

Main Results:

  • Dynamic models did not improve prediction of single organ-specific toxicities.
  • Hematological, liver, kidney toxicity, and electrolyte disturbances were associated with shorter PFS and/or OS.
  • Increasing alkaline phosphatase, decreasing albumin, and hyponatremia predicted shorter OS.
  • Integrating static and dynamic variables significantly improved ML model ability to identify poor responders (PFS prediction AUC 0.91-0.94).

Conclusions:

  • Integrating dynamic prognostic factors with conventional ones can enhance patient stratification and survival prediction in mHSPC.
  • Further multicenter validation studies are necessary to confirm these findings.