Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
Current and emerging therapeutic options for refractory septic shock: A systematic review
Flavio Eduardo Nacul1, Murilo Borges Bezerra2, Brenno Cardoso Gomes3
1Intensive Care Department, Pró-Cardíaco Hospital - Rio de Janeiro, Pró-Cardíaco Hospital, Rio de Janeiro 22280-003, Brazil.
Emerging therapies for refractory septic shock may improve hemodynamics but do not consistently reduce mortality. Multimodal approaches targeting inflammation are critical for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Refractory septic shock presents significant challenges in critical care settings.
- Existing treatments for refractory septic shock have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of emerging interventions for refractory septic shock.
- To assess the impact of novel therapies on mortality, vasopressor use, ICU length of stay, and organ dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science) from 2000-2024.
- Inclusion of RCTs evaluating innovative therapies for refractory septic shock.
- Assessment of primary outcome (all-cause mortality) and secondary outcomes (ICU/hospital length of stay, vasoactive drug use) using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Main Results:
- 24 RCTs evaluated therapies including methylene blue, vasopressin, terlipressin, and combination therapies (hydrocortisone, vitamin C, thiamine).
- Mortality rates varied widely (28.6%-56.8%). Methylene blue improved vasopressor-free days, and terlipressin enhanced renal perfusion.
- While some interventions improved organ function (e.g., SOFA score), no single therapy demonstrated consistent survival benefits.
Conclusions:
- Adjunctive therapies may improve hemodynamic stability and organ function in refractory septic shock.
- Current evidence does not consistently show reduced mortality with novel interventions.
- Larger trials and multimodal strategies targeting inflammation are necessary to improve outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

