Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
Effect of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Delivery of Breast Reconstructive Services and Outcomes
Christy O T Kwok1, Shreya Luthra1, Kimberly DeVries1
1From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Background:
Delivery of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) was severely restricted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with irreversible consequences for breast cancer survivors. This study aimed to determine the pandemic's effect on the provision of IBR services, quality of care delivered, and reconstructive outcomes.
Methods:
For this multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study, data were obtained from all IBR cases during the study periods defined as "pre-COVID-19" (October 1, 2018, to March 14, 2020) and "COVID-19" (March 15, 2020, to October 31, 2021). Patient demographics, reconstructive strategy types, and oncological and surgical characteristics were analyzed. Safety and quality outcomes, including readmission, infection, seroma, mastectomy flap necrosis, and wait times were recorded.
Results:
A cohort of 525 patients was included in this study. Patient and tumor characteristics were similar between the 2 study periods. There was a significantly lower odds of undergoing a single-stage alloplastic surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17-0.94, P = 0.0365) or autologous immediate reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21-0.85, P = 0.015) during the COVID-19 era, with a reciprocal 53% higher odds of 2-stage alloplastic surgery (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.03-2.27, P = 0.0359) during that time. Median wait time from first-stage to second-stage reconstruction was significantly shorter during COVID-19 (P = 0.0017). There were no differences in safety outcomes between the periods.
Conclusions:
Reconstructive strategies differed during the COVID-19 era of resource limitations with more 2-stage alloplastic procedures and fewer single-stage alloplastic and autologous immediate DIEP flap procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
