Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

624
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
624

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of trop-2 expression on the efficacy of trop-2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

EVERolimus effectiveness after proGREssion on ENdocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitor for ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: EVERGREEN study.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2026
Same author

Body mass index in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: An exploratory analysis of the LORELEI trial.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Using Biological Mesh After Extralevator Abdominoperineal resection for Rectal Cancer.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same author

Strengths and pitfalls of NNT and NNH in early breast cancer escalation trials.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same author

Impact of Reimbursement on the Utilisation of Gene Expression Profiles and Chemotherapy Decision-Making in Dutch Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study.

International journal of cancer·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
11:15

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors

Published on: September 20, 2016

24.9K

Economic Evaluation of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in an Advanced Solid Cancer Population.

Lucas F van Schaik1,2, Brigitte Maes3,4, Pieter-Jan Volders3,4

  • 1Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

JAMA Network Open
|December 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) costs €14,249 to match a treatment in advanced cancer patients. This study provides crucial economic evidence for healthcare decision-makers regarding CGP implementation.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
07:59

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.6K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
11:15

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors

Published on: September 20, 2016

24.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
07:59

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.6K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Decreasing sequencing costs enable larger gene panels for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP).
  • The health economic impact of implementing CGP in clinical practice remains largely uncertain.
  • Understanding the costs associated with CGP-based treatment recommendations is crucial for healthcare decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical implementation costs of CGP-based advice in a prospective cohort of advanced cancer patients.
  • To compare the economic impact of upfront CGP versus standard-of-care diagnostics.
  • To provide health economic evidence for CGP adoption.

Main Methods:

  • Economic evaluation of a prospective Belgian multicenter observational study (BALLETT).
  • Decision tree model to assess costs and outcomes over a diagnostic time horizon.
  • Inclusion of patients with advanced solid tumors (May 2021 - Oct 2023).

Main Results:

  • Mean diagnostic costs were €2147 per patient in the BALLETT cohort.
  • Actionable targets identified in 76% of patients, with molecular tumor board (MTB) recommendations in 65%.
  • The diagnostic cost to match a CGP-recommended treatment was €14,249, varying by tumor type.

Conclusions:

  • CGP implementation for advanced cancer patients incurs significant diagnostic costs to achieve matched treatments.
  • The study provides essential economic data to guide healthcare decision-makers on the cost-effectiveness of CGP.
  • Sensitivity analyses highlight the influence of diagnostic costs and MTB recommendation uptake on cost-consequence ratios.