Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
An Intelligent Trial Eligibility Screening Tool Using Natural Language Processing With a Block-Based Visual
Ya-Han Hu1,2, Yi-Ying Cheng1, Chung-Ching Lan1
1Department of Information Management, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
The intelligent trial eligibility screening tool (iTEST) significantly improved clinical trial screening accuracy and efficiency. This tool enhances patient safety by ensuring correct participant selection for trials.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Trial Management
- Health Data Science
Background:
- Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) present challenges in clinical trial eligibility screening due to data complexity and varied terminologies.
- Manual screening is inefficient, requires expertise, and can lead to inconsistent participant selection, impacting patient safety and research outcomes, especially in critical situations like acute ischemic stroke.
- Existing computerized tools often require software engineering expertise for updates, limiting their practical use when eligibility criteria change.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate the intelligent trial eligibility screening tool (iTEST), which integrates natural language processing with a visual programming interface.
- To enable clinicians to independently create and modify eligibility screening rules.
- To assess the performance of iTEST's rule evaluation module against standard EMR interfaces.
Main Methods:
- An experiment was conducted with 12 clinicians at a tertiary teaching hospital using a 2-period crossover design.
- Clinicians evaluated the eligibility of stroke patients for two trials using both standard EMR and iTEST.
- iTEST utilized Google Blockly for rule authoring and MetaMap Lite for concept extraction from EMR data; outcomes included accuracy, task completion time, cognitive workload (NASA-TLX), and system usability (SUS).
Main Results:
- iTEST significantly improved accuracy (0.91 to 1.00, P<.001) and reduced completion time (3.18 to 2.44 min, P=.004) compared to standard EMR.
- Users reported lower cognitive workload (NASA-TLX: 39.7 vs 62.8, P=.02) and higher system usability (SUS: 71.3 vs 46.3, P=.01) with iTEST.
- Notable improvements in cognitive workload were seen in temporal demand, effort, and frustration.
Conclusions:
- iTEST demonstrated superior performance in clinical trial eligibility screening, enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and usability.
- Improved accuracy is crucial for patient safety, preventing inappropriate treatments or exclusion from beneficial trials.
- iTEST's adaptability to structured/unstructured data and ease of modification make it valuable for time-sensitive research and evolving protocols.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020