Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Human Brucellar Spondylodiscitis
Published on: May 23, 2021
Clinical Features and Treatment Differences Among Tuberculous, Brucellosis, and Pyogenic Spondylitis: A Cohort Study
Jiao-Jiao Shen1,2, Rui-Xuan Yao1,2, Ying Ye1
1Department of Infectious Diseases & Anhui Center for Surveillance of Bacterial Resistance, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, People's Republic of China.
Purpose:
There was an increasing incidence of spinal infections. This study aimed to compare and contrast the clinical characteristics and treatment regimens for diverse types of spondylitis and to provide guidance for clinicians to make timely diagnosis and treatment.
Patients And Methods:
One hundred and twenty-five patients with spinal infections admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from October 2019 to December 2024 were recruited. The patients were classified as having tuberculous spondylitis (TBS), brucellosis spondylitis (BS), or pyogenic spondylitis (PS). The patient's treatment regimen and course were dynamically followed up during hospitalization and after discharge. Comparisons of clinical characteristics and treatment among the three groups were performed by SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 10 statistical software.
Results:
The proportion of male patients was greater than female patients (65.00% vs 35.00%). Fever accompanied by pain was more prevalent in the BS and PS groups than in the TBS group (P=0.003). Compared with the TBS and BS groups, the PS group had the shortest duration from symptom onset to hospitalization (P<0.001). Sepsis, invasive manipulation, elevated inflammatory markers, psoas abscesses, and the involvement of three or more vertebrae were significantly associated with the PS. In this study, the median duration of treatment was 77 weeks for TBS, 19 weeks for BS, and 13 weeks for PS. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) should be monitored during treatment. Our results indicated that omadacycline and contezolid exhibited remarkable efficacy in the treatment of spinal infections.
Conclusion:
Patients of spinal infections with diverse etiologies presented varied clinical features and risk factors, the treatment should be individualized. Due to the long course of treatment, ADRs need to be monitored during treatment, and newer drugs such as omadacycline and contezolid are efficacious and have favorable safety profiles.
More Related Videos
03:47A Retrospective Study on Endoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Paravertebral Abscess in Spinal Tuberculosis Patients
Published on: October 25, 2024
10:04Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...