Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
A Multi-National Survey on Immunosuppressive Regimens and Mycophenolate Monitoring Practices after Kidney
Sonia Sharma1,2, Joshua Kausman3,4,5, Simon Craig6,7,8
1Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, sonia.sharma@monash.edu.
Background:
Kidney transplantation (KT) offers substantial improvements in both survival and quality of life compared to dialysis in patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, the success of KT is critically dependent on effective immunosuppression. There has been improvement in short-term graft survival outcomes, but chronic rejection and cumulative drug toxicities continue to present significant challenges. Regarding immunosuppression monitoring strategies, calcineurin inhibitor trough concentrations is a standard practice, but for the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), fixed dosing remains widespread despite considerable evidence supporting for dose optimization based on mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the curve (AUC) monitoring. To elucidate current immunosuppressive practices and mycophenolate dosing strategies, we conducted a survey of multiple transplant centres in India, Australia, and New Zealand.
Methods:
An internet-based questionnaire was sent via professional societies and direct correspondence to practitioners across Australia, New Zealand and India.
Results:
We received responses from 142 centres across the three regions. Most respondents (90%) reported use of antibody induction therapy in standard risk recipients. Maintenance immunosuppression overwhelmingly involved "triple therapy" with tacrolimus (98%), mycophenolate (78% as MMF), long-term corticosteroid continuation (96%). Overall, 78% never used MPA concentrations to guide management, though with geographic differences: 90% of respondents from India reported never measuring MPA, compared to only 32% from Australia and New Zealand (p < 0.001). Major reasons for not measuring MPA were difficulty in attaining MPA concentrations (56%), cost (33%), and uncertainty around techniques to assess exposure and concentration targets (36%). Only a minority (11%) of respondents questioned the clinical value of monitoring in clinical care.
Conclusion:
Across distinct geographic regions, immunosuppression regimen including tacrolimus, MMF, and long-term corticosteroids in standard risk kidney transplant recipients was homogenous. MPA concentration measurement to guide therapy is rarely used in India, though not uncommon across Australia and New Zealand at least in specific circumstances. Overcoming practical barriers and ensuring accessible clinical guidance may provide opportunities to improve the uptake of MPA monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations

