Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Genetic Parameters of Methane Emission, Feed Efficiency, Feeding Behaviour, and Growth Traits in Beef Cattle
J A Silva1, J P S Valente1,2, L F M Mota2
1Beef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Science, Sertãozinho, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract:
Climate change has intensified the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation. Genetic selection has emerged as a promising mitigation strategy; however, studies on Bos taurus indicus, especially Nellore cattle, remain limited. This study aimed to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations for CH4 emission traits and their relationships with feeding behaviour, feed efficiency, and performance, as well as to evaluate the direct and correlated responses to selection for lower CH4 emissions. Data were from 2418 Nellore cattle evaluated in feed efficiency trials. Traits included dry matter intake (DMI), feeding time per day (FTd), feed events per day (FEd), and feeding rate (FR), residual feed intake (RFI), average daily gain (ADG), and mid-test body weight (MBW). Methane emissions were measured in 1153 animals using the SF6 tracer technique, providing daily CH4 emission (g/day), CH4 per unit of DMI (CH4DMI, g/day), and residual CH4 (CH4res). Variance components were estimated using the single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) method through Bayesian inference. Heritability estimates were moderate for CH4 (0.25), CH4DMI (0.14), CH4res (0.14), and performance traits such as DMI (0.35), ADG (0.36), and MBW (0.40). Higher estimates were observed for feeding behaviour traits FTd (0.49) and FR (0.42). Genetic correlations between CH4 and production traits were high, particularly with DMI (0.79), ADG (0.90), and MBW (0.91), indicating that selection for reduced CH4 emissions may affect growth. Direct selection for CH4 led to a modest annual reduction in emissions but also a correlated decline in MBW. These results demonstrate that while CH4 emissions are heritable, their strong genetic association with productivity traits indicates that isolated selection for reduced emissions may lead to undesirable outcomes in feed intake and performance. Therefore, strategies aiming to reduce CH4 emissions should consider the genetic relationships with growth and efficiency traits to avoid compromising animal productivity.
More Related Videos
08:29Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
Published on: November 30, 2018
06:52Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure
Published on: July 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Stringent Response in E. coli
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Production Efficiency