Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Urban-Rural Disparity in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Cohort
Kenneth K Cho1, Edel O'Hagan1, Brodie Sheahen1
1Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Background:
We examined cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation and outcomes related to geographical remoteness.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study of adult cardiovascular hospitalisations in New South Wales, Australia (2008-2018). The primary outcome was CIED implantation in arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and syncope groups (and subcategories) among rural and regional residents. Secondary outcomes included CIED subtypes: pacemaker (PPM), implantable defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), examination of 10-year implant trends, and 5-year mortality rates adjusted for age and comorbidities.
Results:
Of the 1,291,258 cardiovascular admissions, 880,972 patients were from major cities (urban), 304,961 from inner regional (regional), and 105,325 from outer regional, rural, or remote areas (rural). Regional and rural patients received less PPMs (regional: aOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.64-0.69; rural: aOR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.71-0.79), CRTs (regional: aOR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.65-0.78, rural: aOR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.83-0.94), and ICDs for regional patients (aOR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.67-0.77). Differences persisted in subcategories, including PPMs for complete heart block (regional: aOR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.56-0.60, rural: aOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.62-0.70) and ICDs for ischaemic (regional: aOR = 0.44; 0.34-0.56, rural: aOR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.54-0.99) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (regional: aOR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.56-0.73, rural: aOR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.87). Five-year mortality rates were higher in rural patients receiving PPM (urban = 23.7%; 95% CI23.2-24.2, rural = 26.4%; 95% CI 25.8-27.0), ICD (urban = 29.5%; 95% CI 28.2-30.7, rural = 32.5%; 95% CI 31.3-33.8) and CRT (urban = 24.2%; 95% CI 22.9-25.5, rural = 26.9%; 95% CI 25.5-28.3).
Conclusion:
Regional and rural patients had less CIED implantation, with higher 5-year rural mortality rates. Our study highlights the geographical disparity that occurs for patients requiring CIED and the need for further examination to determine the underlying causes and address these inequities.
More Related Videos
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
06:29Wireless Telemetry Device Implantation in a Fontan Ovine Model for Continuous and Long-Term Hemodynamic Monitoring
Published on: May 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring