Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

06:27
Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
Published on: September 4, 2016
10.3K
Keystone Predation: What Is It, and Is It Supported by Empirical Evidence?
Anthony J Gillis1, Mads S Thomsen1,2,3, Jonathan D Tonkin1,4
1School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.
Ecology and Evolution
|December 15, 2025
Summary
Keystone predation, where predators help weaker competitors by eating stronger ones, is widely cited but lacks empirical review. Few studies confirm its ecological importance, highlighting the need for more research.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Community Ecology
- Predator-Prey Dynamics
Background:
- Keystone predation is a fundamental ecological concept, but empirical evidence remains largely unreviewed.
- The process differs from keystone species, focusing on indirect facilitation via predator-prey interactions.
- Understanding keystone predation's prevalence is crucial for community ecology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review empirical evidence for keystone predation.
- To assess the prevalence and context dependencies of keystone predation.
- To identify research gaps and provide recommendations for future studies.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a literature review of studies explicitly testing or mentioning keystone predation.
- Analyzed publication data for geographical and habitat distributions.
- Categorized studies based on experimental manipulation of predator abundance and reported support for keystone predation.
Main Results:
- Nearly 2000 publications mentioned keystone predation, but only 73 detailed the process.
- Most studies originated from North America, temperate regions, and aquatic habitats.
- Only 25 studies experimentally tested keystone predation, with mixed results: 10 supported it, 7 showed context-dependent effects, and 8 found no support.
Conclusions:
- Empirical evidence for keystone predation is limited, making its prevalence and importance difficult to ascertain.
- Environmental factors, species traits, and dispersal likely modify keystone predation.
- Further research using precise terminology and diverse conditions is needed to understand this ecological process.
Related Concept Videos
Keystone Species
24.1K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
24.1K
Predator-Prey Interactions
21.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.0K
Conservation of Declining Populations
12.5K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
12.5K
Optimal Foraging
13.4K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.4K
Habitat Fragmentation
20.9K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
20.9K
Threats to Biodiversity
26.5K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
26.5K

