Centralization of Surgical Care for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Scoping Review

To evaluate the ethical implications, clinical benefits, and challenges associated with centralizing the surgical care of vestibular schwannoma (VS) care.

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus.

A scoping review was conducted per the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search of 6 electronic databases yielded 1,231 articles using keywords related to vestibular schwannoma, centralization of care, centers of excellence, and ethical considerations. After removing duplicates (n=344) and screening titles and abstracts (n=887), 17 full-text articles were reviewed. Two additional articles were identified through manual screening. A total of 15 studies were included in the final analysis.

Hospitals were categorized by surgical case volume (high, medium, low) to compare patient demographics and clinical outcomes. Patients seen at low-volume hospitals (LVHs) were generally older and more racially diverse, and more likely to have public insurance (Medicare or Medicaid), whereas high-volume hospitals (HVHs) served a younger, predominantly White, and privately insured population. Of the 14 studies evaluating outcomes, 12 demonstrated a positive association between higher surgical volume and improved outcomes, including reduced complications, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, and decreased hospitalization costs. High-volume hospitals also had significantly higher rates of routine discharge.

Centralization of vestibular schwannoma care to high-volume centers is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced health care costs. However, these benefits must be carefully weighed against potential ethical concerns, including disparities in access related to socioeconomic status, insurance coverage, and geographic location.