Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026
Dry Powder and Nebulized Aerosol Inhalation of Pharmaceuticals Delivered to Mice Using a Nose-only Exposure System
Published on: April 6, 2017
An Insight Into the Aerosolization Pattern of Formoterol Fumarate Dry Powder Inhalation Formulation Actuated Via Two
Leila Asadollahi1,2, Reza Ghanbari3, Soheil Abbaspour-Ravasjani2
1Student Research Committee and Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Purpose:
Effective inhaled drug delivery is essential for managing bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study compared the aerosolization efficiency of two different dry powder inhalers (DPIs), the Aerolizer and Revolizer, using a fixed formulation of formoterol fumarate.
Methods:
Aerodynamic particle size distribution was measured using a next-generation impactor (NGI), and delivered dose uniformity was assessed with a dosage unit sampling apparatus (DUSA), both at a fixed flow rate of 60 L/min. Drug content was quantified using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and performance metrics were analyzed using CITDAS software. Data were averaged (mean±SD) and compared by statistical tests (e.g., ANOVA or t-tests), with P<0.05 indicating significance.
Results:
The Aerolizer achieved a fine particle dose (FPD) of 4.71 µg, which was 2.39 times higher than that of the Revolizer (1.97 µg). It also delivered approximately 20% greater overall dose and showed more consistent deposition in the NGI stages. While both devices demonstrated similar fine particle fractions (FPFS), the difference in FPD was primarily due to the higher emitted dose from the Aerolizer. The use of a fixed flow rate allowed direct comparison of device performance.
Conclusion:
These findings highlight the significant influence of device design on DPI performance, even when the formulation remains constant. The Aerolizer, a low-resistance inhaler, showed superior delivery efficiency than the Revolizer under standardized conditions. Future studies should include pressure-drop-adjusted or patient-simulated testing to better reflect clinical inhalation profiles and further explore how device mechanics influence drug delivery.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Inhaled Medications
01:30Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
01:22Drug Delivery: Miscellaneous Routes
Oral inhalation and nasal sprays swiftly transfer drugs across the respiratory epithelium's mucosal layer. Inhaled glucocorticoids and bronchodilators directly target lung conditions such as asthma, while fluticasone nasal spray mitigates allergic rhinitis.
Transdermal patches transport drugs...
01:18Additional Routes of Drug Administration
Administering drugs via inhalation allows for the direct delivery of gaseous, volatile substances or droplets to different parts of the respiratory tract. One of the advantages of the inhalation route is the rapid absorption of drugs into the circulatory system, which is possible because of the large surface area of...
01:25Antiasthma Drugs: β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists
One class of bronchodilators includes β2-adrenoceptor agonists. These agents target the β2-adrenoceptors located on bronchial smooth muscle cells. By stimulating these receptors, β2-agonists induce...
01:27Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence