Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

332
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
332
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

277
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
277
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

219
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
219
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences01:28

Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences

207
Social behavior is a complex phenomenon that arises from the interaction between biological predispositions and environmental influences. This intricate interplay shapes how individuals think, feel, and act in various social contexts. Understanding these mechanisms requires insights from psychology, neuroscience, genetics, and evolutionary theory.Environmental Influences on Social BehaviorEnvironmental factors, including temperature, odors, and visual stimuli, play a crucial role in shaping...
207
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

258
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
258
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

249
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
249

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large-scale genomic surveillance reveals immunosuppression drives mutation dynamics in persistent SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Individual locomotor bias drives counterclockwise motion in pedestrian crowds.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Information theory for hypergraph similarity.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Rumor propagation and supervision during confrontation: An importance-driven SIRQS network model.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Inbreeding avoidance in the Raute hunter-gatherers from Nepal.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Ultimate and proximate explanations for human cumulative culture and collective intelligence.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

The growing concentration of national influence in global science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Political polarization in low- and middle-income countries.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Political segregation in the US workplace.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Potential mechanisms and functional significance of aperiodic neural activity.

Nature human behaviour·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.8K

Higher-order interactions shape collective human behaviour.

Federico Battiston1, Valerio Capraro2, Fariba Karimi3,4

  • 1Department of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria. battistonf@ceu.edu.

Nature Human Behaviour
|December 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Higher-order social networks, using math beyond simple graphs, better represent group dynamics than traditional models. This reveals hidden social behaviors like cooperation and contagion, crucial for understanding collective human actions.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans
03:32

Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.8K
Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans
03:32

Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social network analysis
  • Sociology
  • Network science
  • Computational social science

Background:

  • Traditional social network models often simplify interactions to pairs (dyads).
  • This simplification overlooks complex group-level dynamics crucial for collective human behavior.
  • Existing models fail to capture nuanced social structures and their impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and advocate for the use of higher-order social network frameworks.
  • To demonstrate the limitations of dyadic models in representing complex social interactions.
  • To highlight how higher-order structures reveal previously hidden social mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing mathematical representations beyond simple graphs to model multi-individual interactions.
  • Analyzing empirical data from scientific collaborations and contact networks.
  • Comparing insights from higher-order models with traditional dyadic approaches.

Main Results:

  • Higher-order social network structures reveal mechanisms of group formation and social contagion.
  • These structures illuminate dynamics of cooperation and moral behavior invisible in dyadic models.
  • Empirical data supports the enhanced representational power of higher-order networks.

Conclusions:

  • Higher-order social networks offer a more accurate representation of human social interactions.
  • This framework provides a transformative lens for understanding societal relational architecture.
  • The approach opens new avenues for research in behavioral science, team science, and cultural dynamics.