Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A modeling approach to understanding poor stability in people with vestibular hypofunction.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Shoe-rung coefficient of friction as a predictor of slips in ladder climbing.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same author

Sustainable Surgery: A Hand Surgeon's Guide to Ergonomics.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same author

Walking balance recovery in people with unilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·2025
Same author

Associations Between Fear-Avoidance or Pain Catastrophizing and Gait Quality in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Physical therapy·2025
Same author

Comparing sensory organization test measures of the Bertec® Balance Advantage® CDP/IVRTM and NeuroCom® Smart EquiTest® computerized dynamic posturography systems in young and older healthy adults.

Gait & posture·2025
Same journal

Test-retest reliability of spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic measures in marker-based 3D gait analysis: A systematic review.

Gait & posture·2026
Same journal

Effects of auditory perturbations on recovery dynamics as a component of locomotor resilience in healthy young and older adults.

Gait & posture·2026
Same journal

Systematic analysis of success of lower limb muscle combinations in the prediction of ankle biomechanics during stair descent: Guiding input selection in sEMG-based prosthetic control.

Gait & posture·2026
Same journal

Reliability and minimal detectable change of knee mechanics during gait and squatting, using markerless motion capture in the workplace.

Gait & posture·2026
Same journal

An exploration of the association between knee confidence and knee biomechanics in people with knee osteoarthritis.

Gait & posture·2026
Same journal

A balance-weighted gait score (BWGS) reflects biomechanical and control features of gait in older adults.

Gait & posture·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
14:52

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Published on: December 11, 2013

12.0K

Interpreting common standing postural sway measures.

Mark S Redfern1

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Gait & Posture
|December 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Root-mean-square (RMS) and mean velocity (MV) of Center of Pressure (CoP) capture distinct aspects of standing balance. CoP RMS quantifies sway, while CoP MV reflects postural control effort, aiding comprehensive balance assessment.

Keywords:
Balance controlCenter of massCenter of pressurePostural swayStanding

More Related Videos

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
07:52

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Published on: September 18, 2020

8.9K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
14:52

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Published on: December 11, 2013

12.0K
Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
07:52

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Published on: September 18, 2020

8.9K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Motor Control
  • Postural Stability

Background:

  • Force plates are commonly used to measure standing balance.
  • Center of Pressure (CoP) Root-Mean-Square (RMS) and Mean Velocity (MV) are prevalent metrics in balance literature.
  • Understanding the specific postural control aspects measured by CoP RMS and MV is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the distinct aspects of postural control measured by CoP RMS and MV.
  • To clarify the implications of these two common force plate metrics in balance research.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed Center of Pressure (CoP) time series from force plate data during quiet standing.
  • Calculated Center of Mass (CoM) from motion capture data.
  • Computed RMS and MV for CoP, CoM, and the CoP-CoM difference in anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions.

Main Results:

  • CoP RMS strongly correlated with CoM RMS (r > .96), indicating it measures the amount of body sway.
  • CoP MV showed a high correlation with the RMS of the CoP-CoM difference (r > .90).
  • The CoP-CoM difference relates to torque generation for stability, suggesting CoP MV reflects postural control effort.

Conclusions:

  • CoP RMS effectively quantifies the extent of body sway during standing.
  • CoP MV effectively quantifies the control effort exerted to maintain stability.
  • Reporting both CoP RMS and CoP MV provides a more complete understanding of standing balance.