Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
Visual Attention in Rhinoplasty: Eye-Tracking Comparison of Patients and Physicians on Profile Images
Burak Numan Ugurlu1, Gulay Aktar Ugurlu2, Eda Simsek3
1Department of Otolaryngology, Private Clinic, Çorum, Turkey. bnumanugurlu@gmail.com.
Background:
Visual attention influences aesthetic perception and may affect expectations and satisfaction in rhinoplasty.
Objectives:
To compare how patients and rhinoplasty surgeons visually assess facial profiles using eye-tracking technology.
Methods:
This cross-sectional observational study included 26 patients and 13 experienced otolaryngologists. All participants viewed 21 standardized lateral facial profile photographs. Visual attention across ten facial regions was recorded using eye-tracking technology, focusing on first fixation area, total viewing time, fixation count, and revisits.
Results:
Both groups focused most on the nasal region. Patients demonstrated significantly higher visual engagement with the nasal tip, including longer viewing time (25.18 ± 10.23 s vs 15.64 ± 11.19 s; P = .011) and more fixations (97.62 ± 40.64 vs 63.92 ± 42.24; P = .021). Physicians, by contrast, focused more on the radix, with longer viewing time (38.89 ± 17.49 s vs 24.91 ± 17.64 s; P = .025) and more fixations (144.38 ± 47.59 vs 108.04 ± 52.72; P = .043). No statistically significant differences were observed in other facial regions.
Conclusion:
Patients and surgeons focus on different nasal regions, and eye-tracking may help align their aesthetic expectations.
Level Of Evidence Iii:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
