Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

373
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
373
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions01:10

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

370
When measuring distances in areas with physical obstructions, such as a lake in a field, surveyors must employ techniques to calculate accurate lengths without direct line measurements. One effective method is the offset technique, which allows for precise distance estimation over inaccessible stretches.In this scenario, a surveyor must measure a side of an area that crosses a lake. Since the measuring tape cannot span the lake, the surveyor begins by establishing a baseline that aligns with...
370
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultralow-complexity fiber nonlinearity compensation based on gradient-driven pruned Kolmogorov-Arnold network.

Optics letters·2025
Same author

Protocol for Micro Computed Tomography Quantification of Neo-osteogenesis in High Density Additively Manufactured Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds.

ACS applied bio materials·2025
Same author

Effect of Entrapped and Free Calcium Hydroxyapatite Particles on Rheological Properties of Hyaluronic Acid-Calcium Hydroxyapatite Composite Hydrogels.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Mechanobiologically-optimized non-resorbable artificial bone for patient-matched scaffold-guided bone regeneration.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Up to 182 GBd PAM-4 optical interconnects eliminating receiver-side equalization DSP.

Optics letters·2025
Same author

Evaluation of osseointegration of plasma treated polyaryletherketone maxillofacial implants.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Denoising algorithm of Φ-OTDR systems based on adaptive fractional wavelet transform denoising.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Millisecond photon-to-photon latency and high-speed volumetric projection system for optogenetics.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Polarization-encoded coaxial structured light for high-precision 3D surface profilometry.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Discrete freeform optical design based on collaborative optimization of point cloud and local normals.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Ultrafast ghost imaging with 25 GHz speckle switching and wavelength-division multiplexing.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Atomic vapor cells fabricated by femtosecond laser welding of standard-optical-quality glass.

Optics express·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments
06:40

Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments

Published on: January 28, 2021

4.7K

Optimized LiDAR target for benchmarking depth measurement accuracy.

Jiachen Dong, Chuanchuan Yang, Hai Xin

    Optics Express
    |December 19, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Researchers developed an optimized Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) target to improve depth measurement accuracy verification for autonomous vehicles. This novel target enhances signal quality distinction, significantly improving benchmark testing reliability.

    More Related Videos

    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
    08:08

    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

    Published on: March 6, 2019

    5.6K
    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
    07:58

    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

    Published on: July 25, 2025

    723

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

    Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments
    06:40

    Automated Delivery of Microfabricated Targets for Intense Laser Irradiation Experiments

    Published on: January 28, 2021

    4.7K
    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
    08:08

    Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

    Published on: March 6, 2019

    5.6K
    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
    07:58

    Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

    Published on: July 25, 2025

    723

    Area of Science:

    • Robotics and Autonomous Systems
    • Sensor Technology
    • Metrology

    Background:

    • Autonomous vehicles rely heavily on Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) for 3D perception and depth measurement.
    • Verifying LiDAR depth accuracy is crucial for safe autonomous driving, yet benchmark target optimization remains underexplored.
    • Existing methods lack sufficient explainability and optimization for robust LiDAR performance evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose and validate an optimized LiDAR target for enhanced depth measurement accuracy verification.
    • To improve the distinguishability of return signal quality for LiDARs under test.
    • To provide a quantifiable method for assessing LiDAR performance differences.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a LiDAR simulator to model scanning errors in relation to signal quality.
    • Developed a "disparity function" to quantify differences in depth measurement errors.
    • Designed and fabricated an optimized target shape using 3D printing based on simulation results.

    Main Results:

    • The optimized target significantly increased the difference in depth measurement errors between two LiDAR sensors (over sevenfold compared to a planar target).
    • The proposed target effectively prevented confounding error sources from masking performance differences.
    • Demonstrated improved reliability in distinguishing LiDAR performance through signal quality metrics.

    Conclusions:

    • The optimized LiDAR target provides a more effective and reliable method for verifying depth measurement accuracy in autonomous vehicle sensors.
    • The "disparity function" offers a valuable tool for quantifying LiDAR performance and guiding target optimization.
    • This research contributes to the development of more robust benchmarking for autonomous driving systems.