Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary Care Physician-led Population-based Screening Program for Prostate Cancer: Bridging a Urologic Gap in Access to Care.

Urology·2026
Same author

Comparing Surgical Management and Reconstruction of Breast Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Care Center and an Associated Safety-Net Institution.

Clinical breast cancer·2026
Same author

Co-surgery in Breast Reconstruction: Is the Helping Surgeon Actually Hurting?

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Comparing autologous breast reconstruction in high <i>vs</i>. low body mass index patients.

Gland surgery·2026
Same author

Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Options After Abdominoplasty: Lumbar Artery Perforator Versus Profunda Artery Perforator.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2025
Same author

Response to "Submandibular Angle Rotation Flap: A Promising Alternative for 1-Stage Reconstruction of Perioral Lesions".

Annals of plastic surgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.0K

Exploring Breast Reconstruction in Late-stage Breast Cancer Patients.

Nicholas T Haddock1, Thomas C Troia1, Lauren J Kim1

  • 1From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|December 19, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Breast reconstruction is safe for late-stage cancer patients, showing similar complication rates and satisfaction to early-stage patients. This highlights the importance of focusing on quality of life and patient-centered outcomes in advanced breast cancer care.

More Related Videos

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

766
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.0K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

766
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Patient Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Breast reconstruction significantly enhances quality of life for breast cancer survivors.
  • Understanding the impact of treatment regimens and radiation on reconstruction outcomes is crucial, especially for an increasing number of late-stage patients.
  • This study investigates differences in comorbidities, reconstruction techniques, complications, and patient satisfaction between early- and late-stage breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes of breast reconstruction in early-stage versus late-stage breast cancer patients.
  • To analyze the influence of comorbidities, treatment modalities, and hormone receptor status on reconstruction results.
  • To evaluate complication rates and patient satisfaction in different stages of breast cancer.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 989 patients (903 early-stage, 86 late-stage) who underwent breast reconstruction between January 2011 and February 2025.
  • Patients were categorized into early-stage (I-IIIA) and late-stage (IIIB-IV) based on National Cancer Institute definitions.
  • Data collected included comorbidities, neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies, radiation exposure, reconstructive details, complications, and BREAST-Q satisfaction scores.

Main Results:

  • Late-stage patients exhibited higher rates of diabetes, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation, while early-stage patients more frequently received adjuvant hormonal therapy.
  • Hormone receptor profiles differed significantly, with late-stage patients more often being human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and early-stage patients being estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive.
  • Despite differences in treatment and disease characteristics, complication rates and BREAST-Q satisfaction scores were comparable between early- and late-stage groups.

Conclusions:

  • Breast reconstruction is a feasible and safe option for patients with late-stage breast cancer.
  • Patients with advanced disease achieve complication rates and satisfaction levels similar to those with early-stage disease.
  • Future research should focus on tailoring reconstruction protocols for late-stage patients to optimize quality of life and patient-centered outcomes.