Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Support Reactions in Three Dimensions01:27

Support Reactions in Three Dimensions

1.6K
Support reactions in three dimensions help maintain the stability and equilibrium of various structures and systems. These reactions prevent the system from translating and rotating, ensuring the design can withstand external forces and perform its intended function efficiently and safely. Some of the supports providing support reactions in three dimensions are discussed below:
Ball and Socket Joint is one of the supports allowing free rotation about any axis. This freedom of rotation is...
1.6K
Ankle Joint01:10

Ankle Joint

2.7K
The ankle is formed by the talocrural joint (crural = leg). It consists of the articulations between the talus bone of the foot and the distal ends of the tibia and fibula of the leg. The superior aspect of the talus bone is square-shaped and has three areas of articulation. The top of the talus articulates with the inferior tibia. This is the portion of the ankle joint that carries the body weight between the leg and foot. The sides of the talus are firmly held in position by the articulations...
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative biomechanical analysis of volleyball court shoes during sport-specific tasks in competitive adolescent female volleyball players.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Parental perspectives on youth sport specialization: insights on motivators across specialization levels.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Stepping into a safer movement: The relationship between foot progression angle and lower extremity biomechanics during a 45-degree run-cut maneuver.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2025
Same author

Overhead support systems differentially affect gait analysis of overground and treadmill walking.

Gait & posture·2025
Same author

Electromyography-based fatigue assessment of an upper body exoskeleton during automotive assembly.

Wearable technologies·2024
Same author

Dual tasking increases kinematic and kinetic risk factors of ACL injury.

Sports biomechanics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton
09:46

Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton

Published on: June 16, 2016

21.3K

Ergonomically Designed Crutches Decrease Ground Reaction Forces, Joint Moments, and Underarm Pressure Compared to

Shekoofe Saadat1,2, Josh Riesenberg3, Katherine Bricarell4,5

  • 1Department of Kinesiology and Health, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011;Department of Sport Science and Health Education, Simpson College, N C Street, Indianola, IA 50125.

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
|December 19, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Crutch walking increases physical strain compared to unassisted walking. Ergonomic crutches reduce underarm pressure and improve comfort, though standard crutches may be easier to adapt to initially.

Keywords:
crutchesgait analysisjoint anglesjoint momentskinematicsmotion capturepressure

More Related Videos

Use of a Foot-Induced Digitally Controlled Resistance Device for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Patients with Foot Paresis
08:55

Use of a Foot-Induced Digitally Controlled Resistance Device for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Patients with Foot Paresis

Published on: July 7, 2023

597
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton
09:46

Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton

Published on: June 16, 2016

21.3K
Use of a Foot-Induced Digitally Controlled Resistance Device for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Patients with Foot Paresis
08:55

Use of a Foot-Induced Digitally Controlled Resistance Device for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Patients with Foot Paresis

Published on: July 7, 2023

597
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedics
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Crutch walking is less efficient and potentially riskier than unassisted gait.
  • Understanding biomechanical differences and the impact of crutch design is crucial for user safety and comfort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare biomechanics of unassisted gait versus crutch walking.
  • To evaluate differences between standard and ergonomically designed crutches.
  • To assess user comfort and pressure distribution with different crutch types.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized motion capture and force platforms for kinematic and kinetic data.
  • Employed flexible pressure pads to measure underarm pressure.
  • Collected subjective user feedback on crutch comfort and usability.

Main Results:

  • Crutch walking elevated ground reaction forces and joint moments compared to unassisted gait.
  • Ergonomic crutches reduced specific ground reaction forces, hip moments, and underarm pressures versus standard crutches.
  • Users reported higher comfort with ergonomic crutches, but standard crutches were perceived as easier for initial use.

Conclusions:

  • Crutch use significantly alters gait biomechanics, increasing joint loading.
  • Ergonomic crutches offer benefits in pressure reduction and comfort, particularly under the arms.
  • Standard crutches may require less familiarization time, suggesting a trade-off between immediate usability and long-term comfort/efficiency.