Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
[Characteristics and effectiveness of healthcare navigators in innovation fund projects: a scoping review]
Lorenz Harst1, Marie Coors2,3, Helene Hense4
1Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (ZEGV), Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. lorenz.harst@ukdd.de.
Introduction:
Individuals with complex healthcare needs, such as those with chronic and multiple conditions, require continuous, cross-sectoral care. However, an increasingly complex healthcare system, characterized by a strict separation between outpatient and inpatient care, hampers continuity of care and contributes to overuse, underuse, and misuse of services. Healthcare navigators ("Gesundheitslotsen") aim to address these challenges by supporting affected individuals in navigating the healthcare system.
Methods:
This scoping review provides an overview of the target populations, roles, and qualifications of navigators as well as the legal framework and effectiveness of navigators studied in projects funded by the German Innovation Fund (New Forms of Care) since 2016. All projects concerning navigators listed in the Innovation Fund database with a project report available as of 1 April 2025 were included in the analysis.
Results:
A total of 31 navigator projects were identified, addressing a wide range of target groups. The most frequently targeted populations included individuals in challenging life situations (n = 10) and with cardiovascular diseases (n = 5), mental or neurological disorders (n = 5), and metabolic conditions (n = 3). Across all projects, 153 distinct endpoints were evaluated. In most cases, no effect was observed. Statistically significant positive effects were most frequently reported for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (n = 21), process indicators (n = 19), and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) (n = 10). Negative effects were primarily observed in health economic outcomes, particularly in terms of increased costs (n = 5).
Discussion:
Standardizing reporting on pilot projects, concisely describing activities of patient navigators, and making greater use of impact models could help to improve understanding of the effectiveness of patient navigators in the future.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Fundamentals of Nursing Process II
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities