Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Beyond Global Metrics: A Fairness Analysis for Interpretable Voice Disorder Detection Systems
Mariel Estevez1, Cyntia Bonomi2, Dayana Ribas3
1Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación (ICC), UBA-CONICET, Pabellón Cero+Infinito - Ciudad Universitaria, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina.
Abstract:
We investigate and quantify demographic-dependent biases in automatic voice disorders detection (AVDD) systems by analyzing performance disparities across speaker groups, and evaluate group-specific calibration strategies for improving reliability. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of an AVDD system using existing voice disorder datasets with available demographic metadata. The study involved analyzing system performance across various demographic groups, particularly focusing on gender and age-based cohorts. Performance evaluation was based on multiple metrics, including normalized costs and cross-entropy. We employed calibration techniques trained separately on predefined demographic groups to address group-dependent miscalibration. Analysis revealed significant performance disparities across demographic groups despite strong global metrics. The system showed systematic biases, misclassifying healthy speakers over 55 as having a voice disorder and speakers with disorders aged 14-30 as healthy. Group-specific calibration improved posterior probability quality, reducing overconfidence. For young disordered speakers, low severity scores were identified as contributing to poor system performance. For older speakers, age-related voice characteristics and potential limitations in the pretrained Hubert model used as a feature extractor likely affected results. The study demonstrates that global performance metrics are insufficient for evaluating AVDD system performance. Group-specific analysis may unmask problems in system performance fairly which are hidden within global metrics. Further, group-dependent calibration strategies help mitigate biases, resulting in a more reliable indication of system confidence. These findings emphasize the need for demographic-specific evaluation and calibration in voice disorder detection systems while providing a methodological framework applicable to broader biomedical classification tasks where demographic metadata is available.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Non-Verbal Cues

