Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Beyond Global Metrics: A Fairness Analysis for Interpretable Voice Disorder Detection Systems.
Mariel Estevez1, Cyntia Bonomi2, Dayana Ribas3
1Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación (ICC), UBA-CONICET, Pabellón Cero+Infinito - Ciudad Universitaria, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina.
Automatic voice disorder detection (AVDD) systems show demographic biases, misclassifying older healthy individuals and younger disordered ones. Group-specific calibration improves reliability by addressing these performance disparities.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Speech Science
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Automatic Voice Disorder Detection (AVDD) systems are crucial for diagnosing speech impairments.
- Existing AVDD systems often exhibit performance disparities across different demographic groups.
- Global performance metrics may mask underlying biases in AVDD system accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and quantify demographic-dependent biases in AVDD systems.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of group-specific calibration strategies for enhancing AVDD reliability.
- To identify factors contributing to performance differences across age and gender cohorts.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of an AVDD system using voice disorder datasets with demographic metadata.
- Evaluation of system performance across gender and age-based cohorts using normalized costs and cross-entropy.
- Application of group-specific calibration techniques to mitigate miscalibration.
Main Results:
- Significant performance disparities were observed across demographic groups, despite strong overall metrics.
- The AVDD system exhibited biases, misclassifying older healthy speakers and younger disordered speakers.
- Group-specific calibration improved posterior probability estimation and reduced overconfidence.
Conclusions:
- Global performance metrics are insufficient for a fair evaluation of AVDD systems.
- Demographic-specific analysis and calibration are essential for reliable voice disorder detection.
- The findings provide a framework for improving bias mitigation in biomedical classification tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Non-Verbal Cues

