Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Failure of Hund's J in Contemporary DFT+U+J: Insights from Spin-Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
Lórien MacEnulty1,2, João Paulo Almeida de Mendonça3, Roberta Poloni3
1School of Physics, CRANN Institute, and AMBER Centre, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin D02 PN40, Ireland.
Abstract:
The effect of the Hund's J terms in the DFT+U+J family of corrective functionals for (semi)local spin-density functional theory is assessed for a series of four octahedrally coordinated Fe(II) spin-crossover molecules spanning the covalent end of the ligand field spectrum. We report values and analyze trends for the Hubbard U and Hund's J parameters determined via minimum-tracking linear response for all valence atomic subspaces and relevant spin states. These parameters are then systematically applied by using simplified rotationally invariant Hubbard functionals to identify the simplest technique capable of yielding reliable adiabatic energy differences with respect to CASPT2/CC benchmarks. Consistent with previous findings, DFT+U improves the underlying DFT electronic density toward the CASPT2 reference, whereas the inclusion of an unlike-spin Hund's J energy term exerts only a marginal additional effect. Notably, the inclusion of this canonical, positively signed Hund's J term fails to remedy, and in fact, exacerbates the deficiencies of DFT+U in describing adiabatic energy differences in strongly covalent molecular systems. It further reveals intrinsic limitations of the contemporary DFT+U+J framework in simultaneously reproducing the charge distribution and energetics of these systems and hints at directions for its improvement.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
04:51Comparison of Two Different Synthesis Methods of Single Crystals of Superconducting Uranium Ditelluride
Published on: July 8, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...