Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

992
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
992
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

892
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
892
Sampling Continuous Time Signal01:11

Sampling Continuous Time Signal

655
In signal processing, a continuous-time signal can be sampled using an impulse-train sampling technique, followed by the zero-order hold method. Impulse-train sampling involves the use of a periodic impulse train, which consists of a series of delta functions spaced at regular intervals determined by the sampling period. When a continuous-time signal is multiplied by this impulse train, it generates impulses with amplitudes corresponding to the signal's values at the sampling points.
In the...
655
Hearing01:31

Hearing

56.3K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
56.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of Envelope Following Response Normative Ranges for Diagnosing Cochlear Deafferentation.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Normative Ranges for Wideband Middle Ear Muscle Reflex Magnitude: Limited Potential for Diagnosing Cochlear Deafferentation.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Identifying Gaps and Opportunities to Improve Ototoxicity Management in Veterans With Cancer: Evidence From a Retrospective Cohort and Oncology Provider Survey.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

Innovations in Auditory and Vestibular eHealth: Proceedings from the 11th Biennial Conference of the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research.

American journal of audiology·2025
Same author

Approaches to managing ototoxicity in the workplace.

International journal of audiology·2025
Same author

Associations between physiological indicators of cochlear deafferentation and listening effort in military Veterans with normal audiograms.

Hearing research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.2K

Serial Monitoring of the Audiogram in Hearing Conservation using Gaussian Processes.

Garnett P McMillan1, J Riley DeBacker1,2, Michelle Hungerford1

  • 1National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
|December 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Current hearing monitoring methods are prone to bias and inconclusive results. This study introduces Gaussian processes for more accurate and efficient hearing assessments, usable with portable equipment.

Keywords:
Bayesian analysisGaussian ProcessSerial monitoringhearing conservationtest-retest

More Related Videos

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
06:01

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.8K
Computer-based Multitaper Spectrogram Program for Electroencephalographic Data
04:13

Computer-based Multitaper Spectrogram Program for Electroencephalographic Data

Published on: November 13, 2019

12.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.2K
Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
06:01

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.8K
Computer-based Multitaper Spectrogram Program for Electroencephalographic Data
04:13

Computer-based Multitaper Spectrogram Program for Electroencephalographic Data

Published on: November 13, 2019

12.8K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology and Hearing Science
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Monitoring

Background:

  • Traditional hearing conservation programs rely on serial monitoring of pure tone thresholds.
  • Current audiogram shift criteria (e.g., ASHA, CTCAE) are used to detect audiopathic injury.
  • Existing serial monitoring methods suffer from bias (regression to the mean) and yield inconclusive results, reducing diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of current serial monitoring methods in hearing conservation.
  • To propose an improved method for detecting audiopathic injury.
  • To enhance the diagnostic accuracy and utility of hearing monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • Adoption of Gaussian processes for analyzing audiometric data.
  • Development of a novel approach to overcome bias associated with regression to the mean.
  • Focus on maximizing time efficiency and point-of-care administration.

Main Results:

  • Gaussian processes offer a statistically robust alternative to current methods.
  • The proposed method aims to reduce bias and improve the conclusiveness of hearing monitoring results.
  • Potential for enhanced diagnostic accuracy in identifying audiopathic injury.

Conclusions:

  • Gaussian processes present a promising advancement for hearing conservation programs.
  • This approach can lead to more reliable and efficient detection of hearing damage.
  • The method is suitable for implementation with portable equipment at the point of care.