Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Effects of Ciprofol on Hemodynamics During Induction in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective, Randomized,
Hongyi Xiao1, Mingxin Ji2, Xinyuan Shi3
1Department of Anesthesiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, 261041, People's Republic of China.
Purpose:
This study aims to compare the impact of ciprofol and propofol on post-induction hypotension in hypertensive patients undergoing gynecological surgery.
Patients And Methods:
A total of 96 patients undergoing gynecological day surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the propofol group or the ciprofol group. The ciprofol group received 0.5 mg/kg for anesthesia induction, while the propofol group received 2 mg/kg. The primary outcomes included the incidence of hypotension during anesthesia induction and the area under the curve (AUC) of hypotension during the induction phase. The secondary outcomes included the change in mean arterial pressure (MAP), the cumulative dose of vasopressors during induction, the time to loss of consciousness, BIS values, recovery time, the incidence of injection pain, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the PACU.
Results:
The ciprofol group exhibited significantly better hemodynamic stability compared to the propofol group, with a lower incidence of hypotension (66.7% vs 89.6%, RR= 0.415, 95% CI= 0.189-0.915, P=0.007) and a smaller area under the curve during induction (-274.81±88.41mmHg·min vs -323.40±101.32mmHg·min, P=0.014). Secondary outcomes revealed that ciprofol administration resulted in less pronounced MAP fluctuations (37.27±12.83mmHg vs 44.94±13.06mmHg, P=0.005), reduced vasopressor requirements (6.0mg [0.0-6.0] vs 6.0mg [6.0-6.0], P=0.007), and lower incidence of injection pain (4.2% vs 72.9%, P=0.001). While no significant differences were observed in time to loss of consciousness and BIS values during induction (P>0.05), the ciprofol group demonstrated a slightly prolonged recovery time (7.0min [5.0-8.0] vs 5.0min [4.0-6.0], P=0.004). In the PACU, there was no difference in the incidence of PONV between the two groups (4.2% vs 2.1%, P = 1.000).
Conclusion:
Compared with propofol, ciprofol demonstrates superior hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction in hypertensive patients.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

