Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Dashboards to Improve Extractability of Cardiovascular Indicators in a Learning Health Care System: Mixed Methods
Anna G M Zondag1, Karin R Jongsma2, Wouter W van Solinge1
1Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands, 31 887569376.
Dashboards in a learning health care system (LHS) did not improve the structured registration of cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) indicators in electronic health records (EHRs). Challenges included unclear responsibilities, EHR system issues, and time constraints, hindering CVRM data extractability.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) guidelines aim to manage patients at high cardiovascular risk.
- Adherence to CVRM guidelines is variable, necessitating improved healthcare practices.
- Learning health care systems (LHS) and dashboards are potential tools to enhance adherence and data registration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if implementing dashboards in an LHS improved the structured registration of CVRM indicators in electronic health records (EHRs).
- To assess the extractability of key CVRM indicators (BMI, blood pressure, smoking status, CVD history, lipids, HbA1c, hemoglobin, eGFR) in a real-world setting.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods study at University Medical Center Utrecht (Jan 2022-Nov 2023) during dashboard implementation.
- Quantitative assessment of CVRM indicator extractability from EHRs, comparing periods with and without dashboards.
- Thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with clinicians (N=5) to understand perceptions and barriers.
Main Results:
- Dashboard implementation did not improve the extractability of CVRM indicators; registration remained low and stable.
- Hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate were most extractable; CVD history and smoking status were least extractable.
- Compared to a protocolized period, indicator extractability decreased by up to 45%, attributed to unclear responsibilities, EHR limitations, and time constraints.
Conclusions:
- Dashboards failed to enhance structured registration of CVRM indicators in EHRs.
- Organizational, technical, and operational issues impede the effectiveness of dashboards in improving CVRM data capture.
- Findings offer guidance for improving CVRM indicator extractability, benefiting clinical practice and real-world data research.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.

