Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2026

VR Nature Therapy: Embodiment and Emotional Regulation through Immersive Virtual Environments
Published on: April 24, 2026
Bringing the Green Environment From Outdoors to Indoors Through Virtual Reality for Psychological Well-Being:
Dorothy Bai1, Jou-Ting Lin2, Hao-Yun Huang3
1School of Gerontology and Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, 886 2-2736-1661 ext 27749.
Background:
Urban green spaces support psychological well-being, yet access is often limited for city residents. Virtual reality (VR) offers a promising indoor alternative, but evidence on sustained mental health effects of longer-term VR nature exposure remains limited.
Objective:
This exploratory pilot study aimed to explore the effectiveness of a 12-week VR green environment intervention in influencing self-reported psychological outcomes among urban residents.
Methods:
A nonrandomized control group pretest-posttest design was used with healthy urban adults aged 20 to 50 years. The experimental group received weekly 30-minute VR green environment sessions for 12 weeks, while the control group received no intervention. Self-reported psychological outcomes were assessed using standardized questionnaires and analyzed using generalized estimating equations.
Results:
Of the 60 participants recruited, 55 (91.6%) completed the study, with 30 (54.5%) in the experimental group and 25 (45.5%) in the control group. Significant group-by-time effects indicated that the experimental group showed reductions in distress (β=-5.17; P=.03), depression (β=-2.37; P=.003), anxiety (β=-3.20; P=.05), and somatization (β=-6.27; P=.004) scores, whereas the control group showed symptom deterioration. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions:
This exploratory pilot investigation suggests that repeated VR green environment exposure has the potential to be a feasible health promotion tool for supporting psychological well-being among urban adults. These findings are preliminary and should not be interpreted as evidence of clinical therapeutic effectiveness.
