Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
Published on: May 24, 2022
A novel sheath system to improve target access for preoperative mapping biopsy: A randomized trial to inform surgical
Hironori Aoi1, Kentaro Yamao1, Takuya Ishikawa2
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Background:
Accurate assessment of biliary tract cancer spread is important for appropriate surgery. However, conventional fluoroscopy-guided transpapillary biopsy often fails to reach intrahepatic bile ducts. This study evaluated a novel tapered-tip sheath system (SS) for preoperative mapping biopsy (MB).
Methods:
In this single-center randomized trial, 90 patients with suspected malignant bile duct stenosis were assigned 1:1 to SS or conventional biopsy; crossover after technical failure was allowed. The primary outcome was MB success (intention-to-treat [ITT]). MB success was defined as obtaining adequate, pathologically assessable samples from all planned sites. Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure time, adverse events (AEs), and surgery-related outcomes (avoidance of unnecessary surgery, R0 resection rate, and diagnostic accuracy).
Results:
ITT MB success did not differ between groups (91.3% vs 90.9%; P > 0.99). Among patients who underwent MB, crossover occurred more frequently in the conventional group (17/42 [40.5%] vs 0/44 [0%]; P < 0.01), and SS achieved higher target site reach with the allocated method (100% vs 59.5%; P < 0.01). Per-site biopsy success was 95.3% with SS and 91.9% with the conventional method (P = 0.25). Overall procedure time was longer with SS (35.2 vs 26.9 min; P = 0.04), whereas total biopsy time did not differ (9.3 vs 8.2 min; P = 0.14). Rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis were similar (13.6% vs 11.9%; P > 0.99). Regarding surgery-related outcomes, avoidance of unnecessary surgery occurred in 4.8% with SS and 0% with the conventional method (P = 0.55). R0 resection was numerically higher with SS (71.4% vs 50.0%; P = 0.21), and diagnostic accuracy for hepatic and distal margins was high in the SS group (concordance: 83.3% and 90.0%, respectively).
Conclusions:
Despite comparable ITT success due to rescue crossover, SS achieved reliable duct access and may inform surgical planning. When selective biliary access is difficult with the conventional method, novel SS is a useful alternative for preoperative MB.
Clinical Trial Register:
Registration number: UMIN000044509.
More Related Videos
07:47Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
Published on: December 15, 2023
10:25Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
Published on: September 2, 2025