Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Master Protocol Design With Hybrid Control for Efficient Early-Phase Trial Consolidation
Alexander M Kaizer1, Xiaojiang Zhan2, Eric Baron2
1Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Purpose:
Master protocols represent transformations, enabling multiple therapies or diseases under a single protocol. These designs streamline therapeutic development by reducing redundancies. Suited for evolving fields such as oncology and global emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic, master protocols have been exemplified by studies such as RECOVERY, Solidarity, and I-SPY 2, which accelerated effective treatment identification (with I-SPY 2 focused on molecular subtypes). Recent oncology examples, such as MORPHEUS, evaluate immunotherapy combinations with shared controls. Despite advantages, their application in early-phase oncology remains underutilized amid growing regulatory emphasis on randomization for robust evidence.
Methods:
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) initiatives, such as Project Optimus and Project FrontRunner, emphasize randomization in early-phase oncology trials. However, these initiatives pose challenges, including larger sample sizes, patient and physician reluctance to randomization, and high failure rates from poor accrual. To address these, this article adapts master protocol designs to consolidate early-phase trials for novel therapeutics sharing a common backbone therapy, integrating hybrid controls from published standard-of-care data to minimize randomization to the control arm.
Results:
By consolidating trials under a shared standard-of-care control arm, the proposed master protocol design reduces total sample size by as much as 55% when compared with independent trials (with control arm sizes 2.4-2.9 times lower), lowers costs and duration, and enhances enrollment through reduced randomization to controls. Incorporating hybrid controls from prior studies and sharing information among arms with common background standard-of-care further improve efficiency, increasing power (reaching 90% overall) while controlling type I error rates acceptable levels.
Conclusion:
Master protocol designs with hybrid controls and Bayesian information sharing enable the efficient integration of randomization into early-phase oncology trials, enhancing efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and patient-centricity while aligning with FDA OCE initiatives.
More Related Videos
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
06:24Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology
Published on: December 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Preclinical Development: Overview
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.