Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

767
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
767
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

878
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
878

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implicit learning of social information in contextual cueing.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Spatial Attention in Visual Working Memory Strengthens Feature-Location Binding.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K

Spatiotemporal position overlap disrupts feature binding in visual working memory.

Juyeon Joe1, Min-Shik Kim2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodamun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|December 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Task-irrelevant spatial and temporal cues affect feature binding in visual working memory (VWM). Misbinding errors increased when probes shared spatial or temporal attributes, with temporal cues potentially dominating within a single visual field.

Keywords:
Feature bindingMisbindingSpatial informationSpatiotemporal reference frameTemporal informationVisual working memory

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Feature binding in visual working memory (VWM) is crucial for object recognition.
  • Understanding how spatial and temporal information influences VWM binding is key to cognitive models.
  • Previous research has explored factors affecting VWM, but the interplay of spatial and temporal irrelevancies requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of task-irrelevant spatial and temporal relationships on feature binding in VWM.
  • To determine if spatial or temporal attributes of memory items more significantly impact feature misbinding.
  • To examine how spatial configuration (bilateral vs. unilateral presentation) modulates the role of temporal information in VWM binding.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual working memory task with sequential object presentations.
  • Objects were manipulated to share either spatial or temporal positions.
  • Test probes assessed feature binding accuracy, with non-matching probes designed to share or not share spatial/temporal attributes with memory items.
  • Experiment 2 manipulated stimulus presentation (bilateral vs. unilateral) to assess spatial configuration effects.

Main Results:

  • Feature misbinding increased when test probes shared spatial or temporal attributes with memory items, with no significant difference between the two.
  • In bilateral conditions, results mirrored Experiment 1.
  • In unilateral conditions, temporally overlapping items led to greater misbinding, suggesting temporal precedence within a hemifield.

Conclusions:

  • Task-irrelevant spatial and temporal information flexibly influences feature binding in VWM.
  • Temporal information may play a dominant role in feature binding within a single visual hemifield.
  • These findings refine our understanding of VWM architecture and information integration processes.