Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Non-equilibrium in the Cell01:16

Non-equilibrium in the Cell

5.3K
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
5.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.3K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.3K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.4K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.8K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

545
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
545

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) Consensus Statements for the Management of Reproductive Issues in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

International journal of rheumatic diseases·2026
Same author

Retracted Publications Related to Statistics: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

Publication and Retraction Activity in the Field of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Origins, Concerns, and Perspectives.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

Evaluating Large Language Models for Post-Publication Promotion: A Blinded Comparative Study of Social Media Posts in Public Health.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

Healthcare professionals' knowledge and views on unmet needs in prevention of infectious comorbidities in pregnant women with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Rheumatology international·2026
Same author

Patterns of referral and histopathological interpretation of minor salivary gland biopsy in suspected Sjögren's disease: a single-center experience.

Rheumatology international·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Statistical Errors: Implications for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.

Fatima Alnaimat1, Abdel Rahman Feras AlSamhori2, Husam El Sharu3

  • 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. f.naimat@ju.edu.jo.

Journal of Korean Medical Science
|December 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools like Statcheck and GRIM-Test enhance research integrity by identifying statistical errors, improving reliability. While AI offers valuable support in data analysis and peer review, human oversight remains crucial for accuracy and responsible use.

Keywords:
Artificial IntelligencePublicationsScientific MisconductStatistics

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Detecting Attention Levels in Students
06:37

Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Detecting Attention Levels in Students

Published on: December 15, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Detecting Attention Levels in Students
06:37

Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Detecting Attention Levels in Students

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Research Integrity
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Artificial Intelligence in Science

Background:

  • Statistical errors can lead to incorrect research conclusions, compromising scientific integrity.
  • Research integrity demands honest, clear presentation and correct statistical methods.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are emerging as tools to detect statistical errors and aid researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role and effectiveness of AI in identifying statistical errors in research.
  • To explore how AI tools can assist in maintaining research integrity and improving peer review.
  • To understand the capabilities and limitations of AI in statistical analysis for scientific research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of AI tools such as Statcheck, GRIM-Test, LLMs, Black Spatula, and YesNoError for statistical error detection.
  • Analysis of AI performance in identifying errors in methodology, citations, and statistical analyses.
  • Assessment of AI accuracy in controlled versus complex data analysis scenarios.

Main Results:

  • AI tools, particularly Statcheck and GRIM-Test, show promise in spotting statistical errors, increasing research reliability.
  • AI demonstrates moderate overall accuracy, with better performance in controlled settings.
  • AI can expedite peer review and reduce reviewer workload but has limitations including bias and lack of expert judgment.

Conclusions:

  • AI offers valuable, though imperfect, support for research integrity and statistical accuracy, especially with increasing retractions.
  • Effective and safe AI implementation requires large datasets, interdisciplinary collaboration, and secure systems.
  • Human oversight is indispensable for final decision-making, ensuring responsible AI utilization in research.