Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
Published on: November 9, 2011
A comparative study of single-stage and dual-stage classification models for OPMDs
Jiayin Yu1, Rui Huang2, Xuan Wang2
1School of Stomatology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, 410208, China.
Background:
Early diagnosis of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and oral cancer is crucial for reducing oral cancer incidence and mortality. With advancements in deep learning for oral image recognition, this study addressed the limitations of public datasets for oral mucosal disease, which are often restricted in size and insufficient in disease-type coverage. Through comparative analysis, a dual-stage multi-classification approach was proposed.
Methods:
This study established and publicly released a high-quality oral mucosal disease dataset comprising 1,348 images, covering five categories: normal oral mucosa, oral leukoplakia, oral lichen planus, oral submucous fibrosis, and oral cancer. After image preprocessing, we trained and evaluated the models. Ten pre-trained models commonly used in oral image recognition (DenseNet-169, EfficientNet-B0, HRNet-W18-C, Inception-V4, MixNet-S, MobileNetV3-Large, ResNet-101, Swin Transformer, ViT-B, and YOLOv11l) were trained using two classification pathways: single-stage and dual-stage. Model performance was evaluated using metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and confusion matrix.
Results:
The dual-stage classification model based on Swin Transformer and DenseNet-169 achieved an accuracy of 0.9029, precision of 0.9082, recall of 0.8995, F1-score of 0.9032, and an AUC of 0.9735. Among the single-stage classification models, the best-performing EfficientNet-B0 model achieved an accuracy of 0.8710, precision of 0.8715, recall of 0.8719, F1-score of 0.8698, and an AUC of 0.9766. Based on these metrics, the dual-stage classification model demonstrated superior performance compared to the single-stage classification model.
Conclusions:
This study established a publicly available high-quality dataset of 1,348 oral mucosal disease images. Furthermore, it proposed a novel dual-stage classification model integrating Swin Transformer and DenseNet-169, which was demonstrated to outperform conventional single-stage classification model across key performance metrics such as accuracy and precision.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
07:35Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Systems-II
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups