Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
A vision-language model-based approach for lung cancer diagnosis using lossless 3D CT images: evaluation of GPT-4.1
Ning Shi1, Zhenpeng Liu1, Zhenzhen Wan1
1Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering of Hebei Province, College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002 China.
Purpose:
Large vision-language models (VLMs), such as GPT-4.1 and GPT-4o, have shown strong potential in medical tasks. However, their application in lossless 3D medical image analysis is still underexplored. This study proposes a GPT-based diagnostic approach that maintains voxel-level accuracy during data ingestion, structures multi-slice visual inputs for model interpretation, and integrates consensus guidelines to align predictions with clinical standards. In doing so, the approach may provide interpretable and guideline-consistent decision support even for less experienced clinicians.
Methods:
We designed a novel approach that directly processes 3D chest CT scans in NIfTI format, maintains full voxel fidelity during data import and analysis, and is compatible with GPT-based workflows. For each lung nodule, we guided GPT in analyzing multi-slice visual inputs, including bounding annotations, segmentation overlays, and cropped views. Guidelines (Fleischner, BTS, ACCP) were embedded to promote standardized interpretation and guide reasoning from nodule-level characteristics to patient-level assessment. Three NIfTI-based input settings were used to test the method on the LIDC-IDRI dataset: (1) nodule coordinates only; (2) coordinates with guideline-based prompting; (3) segmentation overlays with guideline-based prompting. To evaluate the performance on external datasets, we performed external validation on the Lung Nodule Database (LNDb).
Results:
GPT-4.1 outperformed GPT-4o overall, especially with full-context input, while GPT-4o had higher sensitivity with limited input. With segmentation and guideline-based prompting, GPT-4.1 achieved accuracy 0.722 and AUC 0.780 on LIDC-IDRI dataset. In external validation on LNDb dataset, it reached accuracy 0.767 and AUC 0.780. GPT-4.1 maintained its competitiveness when compared to representative deep-learning baselines and radiologist readers. It also provided stronger interpretability through guideline-grounded and patient-level reasoning with explicit textual justifications.
Conclusions:
This study presents a clinically aligned and interpretable approach for GPT-based lung cancer diagnosis using lossless 3D CT images. The outcomes demonstrate the potential of combining large vision-language models with structured visual and guideline-based context in real-world diagnostic workflows.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13755-025-00417-8.

