Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
The Capacity Gains of Gaussian Channels with Unstable Versus Stable Autoregressive Noise
Charalambos D Charalambous1, Christos Kourtellaris1, Stelios Louka1
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, CY-1678 Nicosia, Cyprus.
None:
In this paper, we consider Cover's and Pombra's formulation of feedback capacity of additive Gaussian noise (AGN) channels, with jointly Gaussian nonstationary and nonergodic noise. We derive closed-form feedback capacity formulas, using Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions and convergence properties of difference Riccati equations to limiting algebraic Riccati equations of filtering theory, for unstable and stable autoregressive (AR) noise. Surprisingly, the capacity formulas depend on the parameters of the AR noise, its pole c∈(-∞,∞) and noise variance KW∈(0,∞), and the total transmit power κ∈[0,∞), indicating substantial gains for the unstable noise region ∀c2∈(1,∞),∀κ>κmin=▵KW1+4c2-32c2-12 compared to its complement region. In particular, feedback capacity is distinguished by three regimes, as follows. Regime 1, ∀c2∈(1,∞),∀κ>κmin: the optimal channel input includes an innovations part, the capacity increases as |c|>1 increases, while κmin and the allocated transmit power decrease. Regime 2, ∀c2∈(1,∞),∀κ≤κmin, Regime 3, ∀c∈[-1,1],∀κ∈[0,∞) (complement of Regime 1): the innovations part of the optimal channel is asymptotically zero and the capacity is fundamentally different compared to Regime 1. The differences of capacity formulas for Regimes 1, 2 and 3 are directly related to their operational meaning: (i) Regime 1 is an ergodic capacity while Regimes 2 and 3 are nonergodic capacities; (ii) Regime 1 is achieved by an asymptotically stationary channel input with a non-zero innovations part, while Regimes 2 and 3 are achieved by an asymptotically zero innovations part. The gains of capacity for Regime 1 are attributed to the high correlation of noise samples compared to stable noise and the use of an informative innovations part by the optimal channel input, which make possible the prediction of future noise samples from past samples, unlike memoryless noise. Our results provide answers to certain open questions regarding the validity of capacity formulas of stable noise that appeared in the literature.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system....
Random Error
Linear time-invariant Systems
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be...
Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
