Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026
Characterization of the Isolated, Ventilated, and Instrumented Mouse Lung Perfused with Pulsatile Flow
Published on: April 29, 2011
Flow-controlled ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation in moderate to severe ARDS patients: a randomized
Julien P van Oosten1, Juliette E Francovich2, Dolf Weller2,3
1Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Intensive Care Volwassenen, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.vanoosten@erasmusmc.nl.
Background:
In mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) it is of great importance to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) using lung protective ventilation. VILI has been associated with a high mechanical power (MP). Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) could play a role in decreasing the risk of VILI by lowering the MP and preventing atelectrauma by a controlled expiration.
Objectives:
To assess the difference in MP between FCV and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Secondary aims were to explore the effect of FCV in terms of ventilation distribution and homogeneity, measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
Methods:
Randomized crossover physiological pilot study in ICU patients with a moderate to severe ARDS. Patients were randomized between 90 min of FCV followed by 90 min of PCV, or vice versa. Intratracheal and esophageal pressure, airway flow and EIT were measured continuously, and hemodynamics and venous and arterial blood gases were obtained repeatedly. Pressure-volume loops were constructed for the calculation of the MP.
Results:
In 10 patients, optimized FCV (compliance-guided driving pressure) versus PCV resulted in a similar MP (12.6 vs. 14.8 J/min; p = 0.302). A stable gas exchange at similar minute volumes was obtained. Optimized FCV resulted in increased tidal ventilation of the mid-ventral to dorsal regions compared to PCV, but EIT demonstrated a trend towards overdistension especially of the non-dependent lung regions. Because of this trend towards overdistension, severe hypercapnia in one patient, and inability to apply FCV as intended, the study was stopped early due to safety concerns.
Conclusions:
Optimized FCV compared with PCV resulted in a similar MP and tends towards overdistension in patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
Trial Registration:
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06051188. Registered 22 September 2023.
More Related Videos
06:22Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
08:12Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Aortic and Pulmonary Artery Hemodynamics in a Large Animal Model of ARDS
Published on: November 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:23Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
01:29Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
01:14Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
01:23Physiological Control of Respiration
Breathing, a seemingly passive process, is regulated by the respiratory center in the brainstem. This center coordinates the involuntary control of respirations, which means it occurs without conscious effort, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted pattern.
Regulation of Ventilation
The body maintains ventilation by monitoring levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and hydrogen ion concentration (pH) in the arterial blood. Among these factors, the level of CO2 plays a crucial...