Potential impacts of delay on pinning impulsive secure synchronization control of delayed networks
Lingzhong Zhang1, Jianquan Lu2, Qihua Ruan3
1School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Suzhou University of Technology, Changshu, 215500, China.
None:
This paper explores the impact of delays on the secure and anti-disturbance synchronization of time-delayed networks under a pinning impulsive control strategy. An exponential-type Lyapunov function and a novel impulsive delay inequality are proposed, extracting and incorporating the information of time delay existing in continuous dynamics into Lyapunov-based conditions. A probabilistic channel failure model is used to analyze the impact of deception attacks and disturbances. Sufficient conditions for mean square bounded synchronization (MSBS) are derived, showing that appropriate delays might mitigate attacks and accelerate convergence. The minimum pinning control threshold to achieve MSBS is derived from the attacks. The factors affecting error bounds are discussed. Numerical simulations on small-world networks, multi-agent systems, and Chua's circuit validate the theory.
Related Concept Videos
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
Network Function of a Circuit
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system....
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...


