Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen01:14

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen

674
A device engineer plays a crucial role in designing user interfaces for mobile devices. One such interface is the resistive touchscreen, which fundamentally consists of two metallic layers: a flexible upper layer and a rigid lower layer, separated by a narrow gap. The high resistance between these two layers is a key characteristic of this design.
When a user touches the screen, the two layers make contact at a specific point known as the touchpoint. This contact reduces the resistance between...
674
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.3K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.3K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.5K
3.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.8K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LLM Powered Text Entry Decoding and Flexible Typing on Smartphones.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference·2025
Same author

Enabling Auto-Correction on Soft Braille Keyboard.

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology·2025
Same author

Using large language models to accelerate communication for eye gaze typing users with ALS.

Nature communications·2024
Same journal

Framing Helper Therapy to Support User Engagement: Causal Evidence from a Public Deployment of a Mental Health Support Text Messaging Program.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference·2026
Same journal

Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference·2026
Same journal

Interrogating the "Us" Versus "Them" Dichotomy in Technology Research with Older Adults.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference·2026
Same journal

Looking Beyond the Screen to Study the Technology Use of Older People Experiencing Cognitive Concerns.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference·2026
Same journal

"I Don't Trust it, but I Use it": Navigating Trust, Privacy, and Identity in Disabled People's Use of Generative AI.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference·2026
Same journal

Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisions.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones
05:42

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K

Tap&Say: Touch Location-Informed Large Language Model for Multimodal Text Correction on Smartphones.

Maozheng Zhao1, Shanqing Cai2, Shumin Zhai2

  • 1Department of Computer Science Stony Brook University Stony Brook, New York, USA.

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI Conference
|December 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Tap&Say, a new multimodal system, improves mobile text correction by combining touch and voice input with Large Language Models (LLMs). This approach accurately distinguishes commands from dictation and pinpoints edits, enhancing user experience.

Keywords:
LLMsmulti-modaltext correctionvoice input

More Related Videos

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.1K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones
05:42

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.1K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Mobile text editing via voice input faces challenges in differentiating commands from dictation and identifying edit locations.
  • Existing multimodal systems struggle to effectively integrate touch and voice for accurate text correction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Tap&Say, a novel multimodal system designed to enhance text correction accuracy on mobile devices by integrating touch interactions with Large Language Models (LLMs).
  • To address the challenges of distinguishing editing commands from dictation and pinpointing edit locations in voice-based text editing.

Main Methods:

  • Developed Tap&Say, a system combining touch input for intent and location with voice input for corrections.
  • Proposed a novel 'touch location-informed attention' layer to integrate tap coordinates into the LLM's attention mechanism.
  • Fine-tuned the LLM on synthetic data including touch locations and correction commands.

Main Results:

  • The touch location-informed LLM achieved significantly higher text correction accuracy compared to the state-of-the-art VT method.
  • A user study showed Tap&Say reduced task completion time by 16.4% and keyboard clicks by 47.5% compared to VT.
  • Users expressed a preference for the Tap&Say system over existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • Tap&Say effectively resolves key challenges in voice-based mobile text editing by leveraging multimodal input.
  • The proposed touch location-informed attention mechanism is crucial for improving LLM-based text correction.
  • Tap&Say offers a more efficient and user-preferred solution for mobile text correction.