Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS for Memory Enhancement
Published on: September 18, 2021
Dementia Care Research and Psychosocial Factors
Dianxu Ren1, Jeong Eun Kim2, Joshua D Grill3,4
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Background:
The Impact of Genetic Susceptibility Testing for Alzheimer's Disease (IGT-AD) instrument, developed to assess the psychological effects of learning genetic information specific to Alzheimer's disease (AD), has been widely used in the literature. Identifying a cutoff score for this screening instrument is crucial for rapidly and efficiently identifying individuals in need of psychological intervention, including those learning the results of non-genetic AD biomarker testing. This study aims to explore the optimal cutoff score and evaluate the predictive powers of an adapted IGT-AD Distress subscale for identifying distress in cognitively symptomatic older adults learning the results of amyloid PET testing.
Method:
We adapted the IGT-AD instrument by replacing reference to genetic testing with reference to biomarker testing. A total of 96 cognitively symptomatic research participants were assessed for psychological impact using this adapted instrument and the Impact of Event Scale (IES) as a gold standard comparison diagnostic tool. The optimal cutoff point for the modified IGT-AD in detecting distress was determined by evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of various cutoff scores, with an IES cutoff of 26 used as the gold standard. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the IGT-AD. The Youden index was used to identify the cutoff point that maximized sensitivity and specificity.
Result:
The mean age of participants was 72.4 years, 40.6% were male, 71.6% were White race, 21% were Black race, and 20% were Hispanic ethnicity. Most (55.2%) held bachelor's or post-bachelor's degrees and 71.9% were married or cohabiting. The optimal cutoff point for the modified IGT-AD Distress subscale was determined to be 22, with a sensitivity of 77.1% and specificity of 82.0%. The AUC for distress was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94), indicating excellent predictive power.
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that an adapted IGT-AD Distress subscale score above the identified cutoff of 22 is effective in detecting psychological distress in cognitively symptomatic persons learning their AD biomarker status. This cutoff may have practical applications in clinical and research settings for screening and early intervention.
More Related Videos
08:36The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Published on: July 28, 2022
10:13Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach
Published on: February 14, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Dementia
The progression of dementia is generally gradual....
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities