Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

8.9K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
8.9K
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:27

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

212
Introduction:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, can include a specialized imaging technique of the urinary system known as Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU). This radiation-free technique uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images with the help of a computer. MRU is particularly effective for visualizing fluid-filled structures like the kidneys, ureters, and bladder.Applications of MRI in the Genitourinary SystemKidneys and Ureters: MRI detects tumors, cysts,...
212
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability01:31

Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability

2.2K
In linear magnetic materials, like paramagnets and diamagnets, magnetization is proportional to the magnetic field intensity. The constant of proportionality, a dimensionless number, is called magnetic susceptibility. The value of the susceptibility depends on the type of material.
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanistic Insight into Self-Gelation Involved in Prescription Design for Optimization of Tablet Performance.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Temporal variations, fate, and influencing factors of organophosphate esters in tropical mariculture ponds near the Northern South China Sea.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same author

Fisetin alleviates osteoporosis by promoting osteogenesis and suppressing adipogenesis via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in mice.

European journal of pharmacology·2026
Same author

Amphibian-Derived Peptide OA-AL14 Alleviates UVB-Induced Skin Photoaging via Autophagy Activation Mediated by the AMPK/mTOR Pathway.

Integrative zoology·2026
Same author

A machine learning-based workflow for transaminase selection.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Development and validation of a cytokine-associated nomogram for predicting severe influenza A virus infection in children.

Virus genes·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
09:30

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease

Published on: December 18, 2016

20.0K

[Research progress on quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging reconstruction method based on improved U-network

Wenyang Yang1, Ruijie Zhang1, Steven Keung2

  • 1School of Computer Science, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, P. R. China.

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi = Journal of Biomedical Engineering = Shengwu Yixue Gongchengxue Zazhi
|December 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging (QSM) uses deep learning U-Net models to improve MRI phase signal processing. This enhances dipole inversion accuracy, reducing artifacts in medical imaging for better disease diagnosis.

Keywords:
Auxiliary diagnosisMagnetic susceptibilityQuantitative magnetic susceptibility imageimproved U-network model

More Related Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.7K
Quantifying Mixing using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
07:33

Quantifying Mixing using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 25, 2012

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
09:30

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease

Published on: December 18, 2016

20.0K
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.7K
Quantifying Mixing using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
07:33

Quantifying Mixing using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 25, 2012

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computational Biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging (QSM) reconstructs tissue magnetic susceptibility from MRI phase data.
  • The dipole inversion stage is critical but prone to artifacts and deviations with traditional methods.
  • Deep learning, particularly U-Net architectures, offers potential to overcome these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize recent advancements (2020-present) in U-Net based models for QSM dipole inversion.
  • To categorize and analyze different U-Net architectural improvements for QSM.
  • To forecast future trends in deep learning for QSM.

Main Methods:

  • Review and categorization of U-Net based models applied to QSM dipole inversion.
  • Analysis of structural optimization, physical constraints, and generalization ability improvements.
  • Synthesis of current research to identify developmental trajectories.

Main Results:

  • U-Net models significantly improve dipole inversion by mitigating artifacts and deviations.
  • Categorization reveals diverse strategies: structural optimization, physical constraint integration, and generalization enhancement.
  • Identified trends point towards more robust and accurate QSM reconstruction.

Conclusions:

  • Improved U-Net models are crucial for overcoming dipole inversion challenges in QSM.
  • Enhanced QSM accuracy through deep learning supports improved medical image analysis.
  • Future developments are expected to further refine QSM for clinical applications and disease diagnosis.