Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: January 30, 2018
Effect of Two Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Scoring Methods on Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trial Design: A
Nancy Temkin1,2, Jason Barber1, Joan Machamer1
1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Choosing how to administer the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) impacts traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical trial sample sizes. Properly defining GOSE (GOSE-All vs. GOSE-TBI) is crucial for accurate power calculations and study design.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
Background:
- The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) is a standard outcome measure in traumatic brain injury (TBI) research.
- GOSE can be administered to assess overall functional limitations (GOSE-All) or TBI-specific limitations (GOSE-TBI).
- The method of GOSE administration can influence clinical trial design, particularly sample size and statistical power.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of using GOSE-All versus GOSE-TBI on sample size and power in TBI clinical trials.
- To determine how different TBI severity and extracranial injury criteria affect these estimations.
- To evaluate the influence of assessment timing (2 weeks to 12 months post-injury) on study design parameters.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 2,288 participants in the prospective observational TRACK-TBI study.
- Simulated the effects of GOSE-All and GOSE-TBI administration on sample size and power using statistical tests (e.g., Mann-Whitney).
- Examined scenarios with dichotomized outcomes and varying Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) severity levels.
Main Results:
- Using GOSE-All instead of GOSE-TBI necessitates an 8-158% increase in sample size for Mann-Whitney tests, or power decreases significantly if sample size is not adjusted.
- Dichotomizing the GOSE outcome requires a 6-165% increase in sample size.
- Sample size requirements are highest for milder TBI populations and decrease over time post-injury for GCS 13-15 patients.
Conclusions:
- Researchers must pre-define the GOSE administration method (GOSE-All vs. GOSE-TBI) based on study aims to ensure appropriate power and sample size calculations.
- Clear instructions for respondents and examiners regarding the attribution of disability are essential.
- The chosen assessment method must be explicitly stated in protocols, publications, and data documentation, and emphasized in examiner training.
More Related Videos
07:21Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022
08:27Development of an Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Model Modified by Weight-Drop Method and Evidenced by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 11, 2025