Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Comparison of Plasma Postprandial Versus Fasting Atherogenic Index in Predicting Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After
Muhammet Salih Ateş1, Erdoğan Sökmen1, Fikret Keleş1
1Department of Cardiology, Ahi Evran University Faculty of Medicine, Kırsehir, Turkey.
Insights
Postprandial atherogenic index of plasma (PAIP) better predicts contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PAIP offers superior predictive value over fasting AIP (FAIP) for CIN risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Clinical Biochemistry
Background:
- Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a significant complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.
- The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), calculated as log [triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)], is associated with cardiovascular risk.
- The comparative predictive value of postprandial AIP (PAIP) versus fasting AIP (FAIP) for CIN remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive ability of PAIP and FAIP for the development of CIN in ACS patients undergoing PCI.
- To evaluate the role of postprandial versus fasting lipid profiles in assessing CIN risk.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 882 ACS patients undergoing PCI was analyzed, divided into a fasting AIP (FAIP) group (n=512) and a postprandial AIP (PAIP) group (n=370).
- Lipid panels were collected either in a fasting or postprandial state to determine FAIP and PAIP, respectively.
- Statistical analyses, including logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, were performed to assess CIN prediction.
Main Results:
- CIN incidence was similar between groups (15.6% in FAIP vs. 16.2% in PAIP, P=.813).
- Mean AIP was significantly higher in the PAIP group (0.643±0.264) compared to the FAIP group (0.493±0.262, P<.001).
- AIP independently predicted CIN in both groups, with significantly stronger predictive power in the PAIP group (OR 46.57, P<.001) than the FAIP group (OR 6.33, P=.003). ROC analysis revealed a higher area under the curve (AUC) for PAIP (0.712) compared to FAIP (0.670, P<.001).
Conclusions:
- Postprandial atherogenic index of plasma (PAIP) is a superior predictor of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in ACS patients undergoing PCI compared to fasting AIP (FAIP).
- These findings highlight the importance of assessing postprandial lipid profiles for CIN risk stratification in this patient population.
Abstract:
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP; log [triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)]), is linked to cardiovascular risk, but the value of postprandial AIP (PAIP) versus fasting AIP (FAIP) for predicting CIN is unclear. The present study compared the predictive ability of PAIP and FAIP for CIN in ACS patients undergoing PCI. ACS patients (n = 882) were analyzed, with 512 in the FAIP group and 370 in the PAIP group, based on the timing of lipid panel collection. CIN occurred in 15.6% of the FAIP group and 16.2% of the PAIP group (P = .813). AIP was significantly higher in the PAIP group (0.643 ± 0.264) compared with the FAIP group (0.493 ± 0.262, P < .001). AIP was an independent predictor of CIN in both groups, with stronger predictive power in the PAIP group (OR 46.57, P < .001) versus the FAIP group (OR 6.33, P = .003) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed a higher area under the curve (AUC) for PAIP (0.712) than FAIP (0.670, P < .001). PAIP is a superior predictor of CIN compared with FAIP, emphasizing the importance of the postprandial lipid profile in ACS patients.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
04:41Digital PCR for Quantifying Circulating MicroRNAs in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: July 3, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging