Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Enhancing vehicle platoon safety assessment: A novel cascading risk measure
Ying Luo1, Xiaomeng Li1, Ashish Bhaskar2
1School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Australia; Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Automated Vehicles in Rural and Remote Regions, Australia.
Abstract:
Surrogate Safety Measures (SSMs) have demonstrated substantial potential in identifying collision risks and supporting traffic safety evaluation. However, conventional SSMs are primarily designed for individual vehicle-level risk assessment, which limits their ability to capture inter-vehicle risk coupling and the mechanisms of potential risk propagation within a vehicle platoon. To address this limitation, this study proposes a novel Cascading Risk Measure (CRM) to characterize potential cascading risks and enhance platoon-level safety assessment. First, we introduce the concept of critical deceleration, representing the maximum deceleration disturbance from a leading vehicle that a follower can tolerate, to characterize each vehicle's risk state. Building on this, we develop a recursive mathematical framework that captures inter-vehicle coupling and the propagation of cascading risks by establishing recursive relationships between the critical decelerations of successive vehicles. This formulation reveals both the direction and the fundamental manner of risk propagation, thereby offering clear physical interpretability. In addition, the recursive framework ensures that CRM naturally degenerates into its single-vehicle form (denoted as DCRM) when no cascading risk is present, thereby generalizing the single-vehicle view, ensuring full compatibility with conventional SSMs, and providing a coherent and interpretable bridge between vehicle-level and platoon-level risk evaluation. The framework also guarantees complete coverage of cascading risks under arbitrary disturbance-propagation scenarios, ensuring that cascading effects are not omitted by design. Validation results show that, compared with existing SSMs, CRM enables earlier identification of peak platoon risk and generates smoother, more consistent risk profiles by better aligning with the evolution of platoon-level risk. These advantages are quantitatively supported by performance gains of 36.18% in MAE, 17.56% in sMAPE, and 22.22% in RMSSD, as well as an 18.84% increase in Kendall's τb relative to the best-performing baseline. CRM also effectively captures the impact of platoon size and vehicle spatial distribution-factors to which conventional SSMs are largely insensitive. These findings highlight CRM's potential for supporting proactive platoon-level risk warning and management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Hazard Rate

