Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
A robust bilevel decision-making model for earthquake disaster waste management
Murat Yeşilkaya1, Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee2
1Department of Industrial Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkiye.
Abstract:
Disaster waste management is known as an optimization problem that demands agile, resilient, and sustainable decision-making under rapidly changing and uncertain conditions. In this context, a bilevel optimization model for post-disaster waste management is developed based on the viability approach, explicitly incorporating agility, resilience, and sustainability considerations. In the proposed model, the public authority, acting as the leader, is responsible for the optimal selection of locations and the establishment of Temporary Disaster Waste Management Centers (TDWMCs). Simultaneously, the private sector, as the follower, undertakes waste transportation, separation, recycling, and disposal activities. Establishment costs and carbon emissions are considered at the upper level, while operational costs, recycling revenues, and carbon tax are accounted for at the lower level. The bilevel model is transformed into a single-level formulation using Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions, and uncertainty in waste generation is addressed through a robust optimization approach. The resulting model is applied to the February 6, 2023, earthquake in Türkiye to demonstrate its practical applicability. The results are analyzed, and sensitivity analyses are conducted with respect to the parameters of the viability approach. The findings indicate that the proposed model realistically captures multi-actor decision-making processes in disaster waste management and provides an effective decision-support tool under diverse policy scenarios.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
